MDC T acting president Dr Thokozani Khupe and six others from that party were this afternoon sworn in as Members of the National Assembly under the Proportional Representative seat.
The other members who were sworn in are: Memory Munochinzwa, January Sawuke, Lindani Moyo, Sipho Makone, Yvonne Musarurwa and Lwazi Sibanda.
The seven were part of 15 MPs nominated by the MDC T to fill vacancies following the recall of some legislators after they ceased to represent the interests of the party in Parliament.
The oath was administered by Clerk of Parliament, Mr Kennedy Chokuda in terms of the law.
Speaker of the National Assembly, Advocate Jacob Mudenda said the swearing in of the MPs followed a letter written to him by the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission (Zec) notifying him of the persons nominated to fill such vacancies.
Earlier a pro-opposition publication; the News Day said MDC-T interim leader Thokozani Khupe and her 14 party nominees’ march to Parliament, where they are set to replace recalled MDC Alliance MPs, is now hanging in the balance following an urgent court application to stop the process.
Khupe and her acolytes were likely to be sworn in today after the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission (Zec) last Friday confirmed the filling of 15 seats by her party nominees, where she was also set to become the leader of the opposition in the National Assembly.
The Zec notice came despite the electoral body sitting on over 10 000 objections to General Notice 2078/202 of July informing the public that it had received notice from Parliament of 15 PR seat vacancies, according voters 14 days to object.
But a voter, Charles Madhiwa of Mbizo, Kwekwe, yesterday approached the High Court, seeking to stop the swearing in ceremony.
He is seeking an order to stop Khupe and her acolytes from taking oath as Members of Parliament.
“Respondents shall not administer or cause the sixth to 20th respondents to take an oath of office as a Member of Parliament nor occupy nor allow being occupied any seat in Parliament on the basis of GN 2553 of 2020 or of any appointment declared therein.”
The respondents are yet to respond to the application.
Madhiwa cited Speaker of Parliament Jacob Mudenda, Zec, it’s chairperson Priscilla Chigumba, Clerk of Parliament Kennedy Chokuda, Senate president Mabel Chinomona as well as Khupe and her chosen parliamentary candidates as respondents.
Madhiwa submitted that General Notice 2553 of 2020 was not consistent with section 157 of the Constitution of Zimbabwe in that MDC-T nominees could not replace another party’s members.
“The Government Notice 2553 of 2020 is declared to be inconsistent with section 157(1)(9d) of the Constitution of Zimbabwe, in that it purported to award seats in Parliament said to be vacant to the sixth to twentieth respondents as nominees of MDC-T without ensuring that those nominated by MDC-T and appointed by Zec were members of another political party MDC Alliance, whose members had won and held those seats; and accordingly that Government Notice 2553 of 2020 and all appointments announced therein are null, void and of no legal force or effect,” Madhiwa submitted.
“I am filing this application as a matter of principle in an effort to stop people from one distinct political party being sworn in as Members of Parliament to fill seats won and previously held by members of another distinct political party, without any election.”
He said if this undemocratic and unconstitutional practice proceeded, it would be clearly violating the Constitution and would also alter the results of the 2018 harmonised election.
“If allowed, it will also alter the election results announced in 2018 by Zec and the chairperson, although under our law, changing an election result can only be done by a court ruling on an election petition, neither of which has occurred here,” he submitted.
“Zec has in effect usurped the role of the courts and purported to alter Zimbabwe’s 2018 parliamentary election results as proclaimed by itself.
“It will alter our Parliament’s composition in a way that is not, by any stretch of the imagination, based on the will of the people as expressed at the last general elections held in July 2018.”
Madhiwa said during the 2018 general elections, all voters and respondents, including Zec and Chigumba, recognised MDC-T and the MDC Alliance as separate opposition parties, irrespective of their legal nature.
He submitted that no party took part in the elections as MDC or Movement for Democratic Change.
He added that the MDC-T and MDC Alliance each fielded their own candidates in those 2018 elections in competition with each other and with other parties and independent candidates.
“I note that Khupe stood for president, while Yvonne Musarurwa, Lwazi Sibanda, Dorothy Molly Ndhlovu, Khalipani Phugeni, Tamani Moyo and Chief Ndhlovu all stood for seats in Parliament, all saying they were sponsored by MDC-T, and all unsuccessful,” Madhiwa submitted.
“Piniel Denga and Teti Chisorochengwe also stood unsuccessfully for Parliament in 2018, at the time being sponsored by MDC Alliance, but later left that political party and joined its rival MDC-T, as of course they are entitled to do.”
MDC T acting president Dr Thokozani Khupe and six others from that party were this afternoon sworn in as Members of the National Assembly under the Proportional Representative seat.
The other members who were sworn in are: Memory Munochinzwa, January Sawuke, Lindani Moyo, Sipho Makone, Yvonne Musarurwa and Lwazi Sibanda.
The seven were part of 15 MPs nominated by the MDC T to fill vacancies following the recall of some legislators after they ceased to represent the interests of the party in Parliament.
The oath was administered by Clerk of Parliament, Mr Kennedy Chokuda in terms of the law.
Speaker of the National Assembly, Advocate Jacob Mudenda said the swearing in of the MPs followed a letter written to him by the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission (Zec) notifying him of the persons nominated to fill such vacancies.
Info News
Debt Consolidation Loans for Credit Card Debt
Debt Consolidation Loans: Pros and Cons
Debt consolidation loans allow borrowers to combine multiple debts into one monthly payment. Many people use them to consolidate credit card debt and reduce high interest charges.
A debt consolidation loan may simplify your finances by replacing several payments with one fixed payment.
Benefits of Consolidation
The main benefit is convenience. You may also qualify for a lower interest rate, which can reduce total interest costs. Fixed payments can make budgeting easier.
Risks to Consider
Debt consolidation does not solve spending problems. If you pay off credit cards and then run them up again, you may end up with more debt.
Some loans also include fees, so it is important to compare total cost.
Conclusion
Debt consolidation loans can be useful when used responsibly. Compare rates, fees, terms, and monthly payments before applying.
Deportation Defense Lawyer: What to Do If You Receive a Notice to Appear
Deportation Defense Lawyer: What to Do If You Receive a Notice to Appear
rnrn
Receiving a Notice to Appear can be frightening. It means the government is starting removal proceedings against you in immigration court.
rnrn
But a Notice to Appear is not automatically a final deportation order.
rnrn
It is the beginning of a legal process. What you do next matters.
rnrn
A deportation defense lawyer can help you understand the charges, review possible defenses, prepare evidence, and represent you before an immigration judge.
rnrn
What Is a Notice to Appear?
rnrn
A Notice to Appear, often called an NTA, is a charging document used in immigration court. It explains why the government believes a noncitizen may be removable from the United States.
rnrn
EOIR explains that at an immigration court hearing, the judge may ask whether the allegations are true and whether you agree with the charges. If there is an error in the Notice to Appear, you must tell the immigration judge.
rnrn
Why You Should Take an NTA Seriously
rnrn
An NTA can lead to removal proceedings. If you miss a hearing, the immigration judge may order removal in your absence.
rnrn
You should immediately:
rnrn
Read the Notice to Appear carefully
rnCheck your name and address
rnReview the allegations
rnLook for hearing information
rnKeep every document
rnUpdate your address if you move
rnConsult an immigration lawyer quickly
rnrn
The official ICE Notice to Appear form warns that people in proceedings must notify immigration court and DHS immediately if their address or phone number changes, using Form EOIR-33.
rnrn
What Does a Deportation Defense Lawyer Do?
rnrn
A deportation defense lawyer may help with:
rnrn
Reviewing the NTA
rnChecking for errors
rnExplaining the charges
rnIdentifying defenses
rnPreparing court filings
rnRepresenting you at hearings
rnApplying for relief from removal
rnGathering evidence
rnPreparing witness statements
rnFiling motions
rnAppealing decisions
rnrn
Immigration court is serious. Having a lawyer can help you avoid mistakes that may harm your case.
rnrn
Possible Defenses in Removal Proceedings
rnrn
Every case is different, but possible options may include:
rnrn
Asylum
rnWithholding of removal
rnProtection under the Convention Against Torture
rnCancellation of removal
rnAdjustment of status
rnVoluntary departure
rnWaivers
rnTermination of proceedings
rnMotions to reopen
rnAppeals
rnrn
A lawyer can review whether any of these options apply.
rnrn
Common Reasons People Face Removal Proceedings
rnrn
A person may be placed in removal proceedings for reasons such as:
rnrn
Visa overstay
rnUnlawful entry
rnCriminal conviction
rnViolation of visa terms
rnDenied immigration application
rnAlleged fraud or misrepresentation
rnLoss of lawful status
rnPrior removal order
rnrn
Some cases are more defensible than others. The facts matter.
rnrn
What Happens in Immigration Court?
rnrn
Immigration court cases usually involve several stages.
rnrn
Master Calendar Hearing
rnrn
This is often the first hearing. The judge may review the charges, confirm your information, ask about representation, and set deadlines.
rnrn
Individual Hearing
rnrn
This is the trial-like hearing where evidence and testimony may be presented.
rnrn
Judge’s Decision
rnrn
The immigration judge may grant relief, deny relief, order removal, or issue another ruling depending on the case.
rnrn
Appeal
rnrn
Some cases may be appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals.
rnrn
Why Deadlines Matter
rnrn
Immigration court deadlines are strict. Missing a filing deadline can damage your case.
rnrn
Deadlines may involve:
rnrn
Applications for relief
rnEvidence submission
rnWitness lists
rnBriefs
rnMotions
rnAppeals
rnAddress updates
rnrn
Do not wait until the last minute to seek help.
rnrn
How to Choose a Deportation Defense Lawyer
rnrn
Look for an attorney who:
rnrn
Handles immigration court cases
rnUnderstands removal defense
rnHas experience with your type of case
rnCommunicates clearly
rnExplains risks honestly
rnPrepares thoroughly
rnProvides a written fee agreement
rnrn
Not every immigration lawyer regularly appears in court. Ask directly.
rnrn
What to Bring to a Consultation
rnrn
Bring:
rnrn
Notice to Appear
rnHearing notices
rnPassport
rnVisa records
rnGreen card, if any
rnWork permit, if any
rnPrior USCIS filings
rnCriminal court records
rnImmigration notices
rnMarriage or family documents
rnProof of residence
rnEvidence of hardship
rnCountry condition evidence, if relevant
rnrn
The more complete your documents, the better an attorney can evaluate your case.
rnrn
Final Thoughts
rnrn
A Notice to Appear should never be ignored. It is not a final deportation order, but it is a serious legal warning.
rnrn
A deportation defense lawyer can help you understand the charges, meet deadlines, prepare evidence, and fight for available relief.
rnrn
When immigration court is involved, quick action can make a major difference.
rn