Tuesday, August 04

Khupe & Six Others Sworn In As Members Of Parliament

MDC T acting president Dr Thokozani Khupe and six others from that party were this afternoon sworn in as Members of the National Assembly under the Proportional Representative seat.

The other members who were sworn in are: Memory Munochinzwa, January Sawuke, Lindani Moyo, Sipho Makone, Yvonne Musarurwa and Lwazi Sibanda.

The seven were part of 15 MPs nominated by the MDC T to fill vacancies following the recall of some legislators after they ceased to represent the interests of the party in Parliament.

The oath was administered by Clerk of Parliament, Mr Kennedy Chokuda in terms of the law.

Speaker of the National Assembly, Advocate Jacob Mudenda said the swearing in of the MPs followed a letter written to him by the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission (Zec) notifying him of the persons nominated to fill such vacancies.

Earlier a pro-opposition publication; the News Day said MDC-T interim leader Thokozani Khupe and her 14 party nominees’ march to Parliament, where they are set to replace recalled MDC Alliance MPs, is now hanging in the balance following an urgent court application to stop the process.

Khupe and her acolytes were likely to be sworn in today after the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission (Zec) last Friday confirmed the filling of 15 seats by her party nominees, where she was also set to become the leader of the opposition in the National Assembly.

The Zec notice came despite the electoral body sitting on over 10 000 objections to General Notice 2078/202 of July informing the public that it had received notice from Parliament of 15 PR seat vacancies, according voters 14 days to object.

But a voter, Charles Madhiwa of Mbizo, Kwekwe, yesterday approached the High Court, seeking to stop the swearing in ceremony.

He is seeking an order to stop Khupe and her acolytes from taking oath as Members of Parliament.

“Respondents shall not administer or cause the sixth to 20th respondents to take an oath of office as a Member of Parliament nor occupy nor allow being occupied any seat in Parliament on the basis of GN 2553 of 2020 or of any appointment declared therein.”

The respondents are yet to respond to the application.

Madhiwa cited Speaker of Parliament Jacob Mudenda, Zec, it’s chairperson Priscilla Chigumba, Clerk of Parliament Kennedy Chokuda, Senate president Mabel Chinomona as well as Khupe and her chosen parliamentary candidates as respondents.

Madhiwa submitted that General Notice 2553 of 2020 was not consistent with section 157 of the Constitution of Zimbabwe in that MDC-T nominees could not replace another party’s members.

“The Government Notice 2553 of 2020 is declared to be inconsistent with section 157(1)(9d) of the Constitution of Zimbabwe, in that it purported to award seats in Parliament said to be vacant to the sixth to twentieth respondents as nominees of MDC-T without ensuring that those nominated by MDC-T and appointed by Zec were members of another political party MDC Alliance, whose members had won and held those seats; and accordingly that Government Notice 2553 of 2020 and all appointments announced therein are null, void and of no legal force or effect,” Madhiwa submitted.

“I am filing this application as a matter of principle in an effort to stop people from one distinct political party being sworn in as Members of Parliament to fill seats won and previously held by members of another distinct political party, without any election.”

He said if this undemocratic and unconstitutional practice proceeded, it would be clearly violating the Constitution and would also alter the results of the 2018 harmonised election.

“If allowed, it will also alter the election results announced in 2018 by Zec and the chairperson, although under our law, changing an election result can only be done by a court ruling on an election petition, neither of which has occurred here,” he submitted.

“Zec has in effect usurped the role of the courts and purported to alter Zimbabwe’s 2018 parliamentary election results as proclaimed by itself.

“It will alter our Parliament’s composition in a way that is not, by any stretch of the imagination, based on the will of the people as expressed at the last general elections held in July 2018.”

Madhiwa said during the 2018 general elections, all voters and respondents, including Zec and Chigumba, recognised MDC-T and the MDC Alliance as separate opposition parties, irrespective of their legal nature.

He submitted that no party took part in the elections as MDC or Movement for Democratic Change.

He added that the MDC-T and MDC Alliance each fielded their own candidates in those 2018 elections in competition with each other and with other parties and independent candidates.

“I note that Khupe stood for president, while Yvonne Musarurwa, Lwazi Sibanda, Dorothy Molly Ndhlovu, Khalipani Phugeni, Tamani Moyo and Chief Ndhlovu all stood for seats in Parliament, all saying they were sponsored by MDC-T, and all unsuccessful,” Madhiwa submitted.

“Piniel Denga and Teti Chisorochengwe also stood unsuccessfully for Parliament in 2018, at the time being sponsored by MDC Alliance, but later left that political party and joined its rival MDC-T, as of course they are entitled to do.”
MDC T acting president Dr Thokozani Khupe and six others from that party were this afternoon sworn in as Members of the National Assembly under the Proportional Representative seat.

The other members who were sworn in are: Memory Munochinzwa, January Sawuke, Lindani Moyo, Sipho Makone, Yvonne Musarurwa and Lwazi Sibanda.

The seven were part of 15 MPs nominated by the MDC T to fill vacancies following the recall of some legislators after they ceased to represent the interests of the party in Parliament.

The oath was administered by Clerk of Parliament, Mr Kennedy Chokuda in terms of the law.
Speaker of the National Assembly, Advocate Jacob Mudenda said the swearing in of the MPs followed a letter written to him by the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission (Zec) notifying him of the persons nominated to fill such vacancies.

  • Share:

Info News

Debt Consolidation Loans for Credit Card Debt

Debt Consolidation Loans: Pros and Cons

Debt consolidation loans allow borrowers to combine multiple debts into one monthly payment. Many people use them to consolidate credit card debt and reduce high interest charges.

A debt consolidation loan may simplify your finances by replacing several payments with one fixed payment.

Benefits of Consolidation

The main benefit is convenience. You may also qualify for a lower interest rate, which can reduce total interest costs. Fixed payments can make budgeting easier.

Risks to Consider

Debt consolidation does not solve spending problems. If you pay off credit cards and then run them up again, you may end up with more debt.

Some loans also include fees, so it is important to compare total cost.

Conclusion

Debt consolidation loans can be useful when used responsibly. Compare rates, fees, terms, and monthly payments before applying.

Deportation Defense Lawyer: What to Do If You Receive a Notice to Appear

Deportation Defense Lawyer: What to Do If You Receive a Notice to Appear

rnrn

Receiving a Notice to Appear can be frightening. It means the government is starting removal proceedings against you in immigration court.

rnrn

But a Notice to Appear is not automatically a final deportation order.

rnrn

It is the beginning of a legal process. What you do next matters.

rnrn

A deportation defense lawyer can help you understand the charges, review possible defenses, prepare evidence, and represent you before an immigration judge.

rnrn

What Is a Notice to Appear?

rnrn

A Notice to Appear, often called an NTA, is a charging document used in immigration court. It explains why the government believes a noncitizen may be removable from the United States.

rnrn

EOIR explains that at an immigration court hearing, the judge may ask whether the allegations are true and whether you agree with the charges. If there is an error in the Notice to Appear, you must tell the immigration judge.

rnrn

Why You Should Take an NTA Seriously

rnrn

An NTA can lead to removal proceedings. If you miss a hearing, the immigration judge may order removal in your absence.

rnrn

You should immediately:

rnrn

Read the Notice to Appear carefully
rnCheck your name and address
rnReview the allegations
rnLook for hearing information
rnKeep every document
rnUpdate your address if you move
rnConsult an immigration lawyer quickly

rnrn

The official ICE Notice to Appear form warns that people in proceedings must notify immigration court and DHS immediately if their address or phone number changes, using Form EOIR-33.

rnrn

What Does a Deportation Defense Lawyer Do?

rnrn

A deportation defense lawyer may help with:

rnrn

Reviewing the NTA
rnChecking for errors
rnExplaining the charges
rnIdentifying defenses
rnPreparing court filings
rnRepresenting you at hearings
rnApplying for relief from removal
rnGathering evidence
rnPreparing witness statements
rnFiling motions
rnAppealing decisions

rnrn

Immigration court is serious. Having a lawyer can help you avoid mistakes that may harm your case.

rnrn

Possible Defenses in Removal Proceedings

rnrn

Every case is different, but possible options may include:

rnrn

Asylum
rnWithholding of removal
rnProtection under the Convention Against Torture
rnCancellation of removal
rnAdjustment of status
rnVoluntary departure
rnWaivers
rnTermination of proceedings
rnMotions to reopen
rnAppeals

rnrn

A lawyer can review whether any of these options apply.

rnrn

Common Reasons People Face Removal Proceedings

rnrn

A person may be placed in removal proceedings for reasons such as:

rnrn

Visa overstay
rnUnlawful entry
rnCriminal conviction
rnViolation of visa terms
rnDenied immigration application
rnAlleged fraud or misrepresentation
rnLoss of lawful status
rnPrior removal order

rnrn

Some cases are more defensible than others. The facts matter.

rnrn

What Happens in Immigration Court?

rnrn

Immigration court cases usually involve several stages.

rnrn

Master Calendar Hearing

rnrn

This is often the first hearing. The judge may review the charges, confirm your information, ask about representation, and set deadlines.

rnrn

Individual Hearing

rnrn

This is the trial-like hearing where evidence and testimony may be presented.

rnrn

Judge’s Decision

rnrn

The immigration judge may grant relief, deny relief, order removal, or issue another ruling depending on the case.

rnrn

Appeal

rnrn

Some cases may be appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals.

rnrn

Why Deadlines Matter

rnrn

Immigration court deadlines are strict. Missing a filing deadline can damage your case.

rnrn

Deadlines may involve:

rnrn

Applications for relief
rnEvidence submission
rnWitness lists
rnBriefs
rnMotions
rnAppeals
rnAddress updates

rnrn

Do not wait until the last minute to seek help.

rnrn

How to Choose a Deportation Defense Lawyer

rnrn

Look for an attorney who:

rnrn

Handles immigration court cases
rnUnderstands removal defense
rnHas experience with your type of case
rnCommunicates clearly
rnExplains risks honestly
rnPrepares thoroughly
rnProvides a written fee agreement

rnrn

Not every immigration lawyer regularly appears in court. Ask directly.

rnrn

What to Bring to a Consultation

rnrn

Bring:

rnrn

Notice to Appear
rnHearing notices
rnPassport
rnVisa records
rnGreen card, if any
rnWork permit, if any
rnPrior USCIS filings
rnCriminal court records
rnImmigration notices
rnMarriage or family documents
rnProof of residence
rnEvidence of hardship
rnCountry condition evidence, if relevant

rnrn

The more complete your documents, the better an attorney can evaluate your case.

rnrn

Final Thoughts

rnrn

A Notice to Appear should never be ignored. It is not a final deportation order, but it is a serious legal warning.

rnrn

A deportation defense lawyer can help you understand the charges, meet deadlines, prepare evidence, and fight for available relief.

rnrn

When immigration court is involved, quick action can make a major difference.

rn