Monday, August 03

Mnangagwa Government Responds To Malema Garapasi You Are An Empty Bucket & Puppet Of G40 & Kasukuwere

ZIMBABWE will not be lectured by misinformed and misguided regional parties such as the South African Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) on anything as the country is not a province of South Africa. 

Responding to a misleading statement issued by the Generation 40 (G40) linked EFF, which sought to cast aspersions at the recently signed US$3.5 billion Global Compensation Deed (GCD) deal between Government and representatives of former white farmers, the Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of Information, Publicity and Broadcasting Services Mr Nick Mangwana said the agreement was a fulfilment of constitutional provisions.

"The compensation of the said farmers is in line with the Zimbabwe Constitution, overwhelmingly voted for by the majority of Zimbabweans, political leaders across the divide included. Mnangagwa Government Responds To Malema Garapasi You Are An Empty Bucket that makes a lot of noise& Puppet Of G40 & Kasukuwere 

Specifically, Chapter 16, Section 295 Sub Section 3, as read with Section 72 Sub Section 3 (a), obligates the State to pay compensation for improvements that were on land when such land was acquired," he said. 

Julius Malema's EFF, which has offered a political home to members of the decapitated G40 faction, who are running away from the long arm of the law, in its statement wrongly claimed that the Government would pay for the land with money that has since been secured but this is far from the truth. 

Julius Malema Under the historic agreement, that was sealed at State House on Wednesday, and which puts to rest the land question, both Government and the white former farmers will mobilise financing of the Global Compensation Deed and payment is only for improvements that were made at the farms, not the land. 

"Government has not 'secured' the US$3.5 billion compensation as again claimed by Malema. Following the signing, both sides will now jointly mount initiatives to raise the funds.

"Any claims contrary to the above-stated facts which are publicly available, point to deliberate misinformation or lack of understanding of the intricate nature of Zimbabwe's land history," said Mr Mangwana. 

The Permanent Secretary reminded the EFF that President Mnangagwa "is well aware of the causes of the economic challenges bedevilling Zimbabwe and does not need to rely on hastily made conclusions by excitable entities that are yet to garner requisite experience in management of such issues". He said had Malema and his partners used appropriate diplomatic channels, he could have been told the real facts around the historic land deal that has been hailed globally as a milestone. 

"Government also takes offence at the uncouth but unsurprising attacks on the person of President Mnangagwa by Malema who appears to be under the illusion that vulgarity is an ideology. We therefore wish to remind Mr Malema that Zimbabwe is not a province of South Africa or one of his shacks and he should leave Zimbabweans to deal with Zimbabwean issues. 

"While Zimbabwe welcomes any counsel from its neighbours, Government is of the view that Malema, as one of the opposition leaders in South Africa, is better occupied tackling challenges in his own country rather than pronouncing himself on matters he is not well versed with in Zimbabwe," he said Commenting on the same issue, Zanu-PF director for Information and Publicity Tafadzwa Mugwadi said Malema has no moral ground to talk about Zimbabwe.

"Mr Julius Malema or marema, whatever is the proper pronunciation, has no moral ground to poke his nose and uncircumcised mouth on matters of Zimbabwe, which he is historically, foundationally and contemporarily unschooled on. It is not only surprising but absolute hogwash that while our Zimbabwean indigenous farmers who benefited from the land reform itself are yet to comment, Mr Malema and his moribund group of provocateurs, desperate of waning domestic traction in SA politics, think that Zimbabwe is a readily available vantage from which to revive fading fortunes. 

"As a candid reminder, Mr Malema has never dealt with nor can he claim any experience in empirical management of decolonisation processes to which land is the nuclei. Until he can give us a single exemplary EFF beneficiary of land reform in his own society, then we have neither parlance nor parity with him or his outfit," said Mugwadi. 

He said by accommodating political misfits in the form of former G40 functionaries, and becoming their puppet, Malema will soon meet his Waterloo just as did the former. Zimbabwe is one of the few countries in the world that has successfully given land back to the majority, while in neighbouring countries the black majority continue to coax a living on the economic margins.

 

.

  • Share:

Info News

Cyber Insurance for Small Business: Coverage Guide

Cyber insurance has moved from a nice-to-have policy to a serious risk management tool for small businesses. Even companies with fewer than 50 employees depend on email, cloud software, online banking, remote access, customer databases, websites, point-of-sale systems, and mobile devices. A single ransomware infection, stolen password, or fraudulent wire request can stop operations and create expensive response costs.

Cyber insurance is designed to help with certain costs after a covered cyber incident. It is not a replacement for good security, but it can support response and recovery when controls fail. The exact coverage depends on the insurer, policy form, endorsements, exclusions, and security requirements.

First-party coverage applies to the business's own losses. This may include breach response, forensic investigation, data restoration, business interruption, ransomware response, crisis communications, legal consultation, and customer notification. If a business cannot operate because systems are locked or cloud access is disrupted, business interruption coverage may help replace covered lost income during the downtime period.

Third-party coverage applies when other people or organizations claim your business caused harm. This may include legal defense, settlements, regulatory investigations, privacy claims, media liability, or contractual claims after a data breach. Businesses that store customer records, health information, financial data, payment information, or confidential client files should pay close attention to this area.

Business email compromise is one of the most important topics to ask about. Many losses now involve fraudulent emails, fake invoices, payroll diversion, vendor impersonation, or wire transfer scams. Some cyber policies cover social engineering or funds transfer fraud only if a special endorsement is added. Others exclude it or provide a lower sublimit. Ask specifically: If an employee is tricked into sending money to a criminal, is that covered?

Ransomware coverage also varies. Some policies may help with negotiation, legal guidance, recovery support, and covered payments where legally allowed. However, insurers may require security controls before offering ransomware coverage. These controls can include multifactor authentication, endpoint detection, backups, patch management, email filtering, employee training, and privileged access restrictions.

Cyber insurance applications have become more detailed. Insurers may ask whether multifactor authentication is used for email, remote access, administrator accounts, and cloud systems. They may ask about backups, encryption, endpoint protection, firewalls, vulnerability scanning, incident response plans, vendor access, and security training. Answer honestly. Inaccurate answers can create problems during a claim.

Not every cyber event is covered. Common exclusions may involve prior known incidents, war or nation-state activity, bodily injury, infrastructure failure, intentional acts, failure to maintain required controls, unencrypted devices, or losses outside policy definitions. Because exclusions can be broad, review the policy with someone who understands cyber risk.

Small businesses should also ask about the insurer's response team. A strong cyber policy is not just a reimbursement document. It should connect the business with breach coaches, forensic firms, ransomware response vendors, public relations support, and legal resources. In an incident, speed matters. Knowing who to call can reduce confusion.

Cyber insurance pricing depends on revenue, industry, data type, employee count, security controls, claims history, remote access, vendor exposure, and coverage limits. Health care, financial services, legal firms, schools, professional services, and e-commerce businesses may face higher scrutiny because they handle sensitive data or payments.

Before buying a policy, map your most important systems. Include email, accounting, online banking, payroll, website hosting, customer records, cloud drives, point-of-sale, remote access, and backup systems. Then compare policy limits against realistic incident costs. A small ransomware event can involve forensics, legal review, overtime, lost revenue, customer notice, and system rebuilds.

Cyber insurance works best when paired with basic security. Use multifactor authentication, strong password management, least privilege access, regular patching, offline or immutable backups, endpoint protection, DNS filtering, email security, vendor reviews, and employee phishing training. Document these controls because insurers may request proof.

For small businesses, cyber insurance is not about fear. It is about resilience. The right policy can help a company recover faster, protect customers, and survive an incident that might otherwise be financially damaging.

Catastrophic Truck Accident Attorney: Legal Help for Life-Altering Injuries

A catastrophic truck accident attorney represents clients who have suffered life-changing injuries due to severe truck collisions. These cases often involve permanent disabilities, long-term medical care, and significant financial burdens. Because the impact is so profound, compensation claims must account for future expenses, including ongoing treatment and loss of earning capacity.

rnrn

Experienced attorneys in catastrophic injury cases work with medical professionals, financial experts, and accident reconstruction specialists to build a comprehensive claim. They fight to ensure that clients receive compensation that reflects the true extent of their losses. With the right legal support, victims and their families can secure the financial resources needed to rebuild their lives after a devastating accident.

rn