Saturday, August 29

ZAOGA Church Elder Innocent Majoni Jailed for 13 Years in UK—But Police Say He Is Still on the Run In Zimbabwe

A Zimbabwean national who reportedly served as an elder at a Zimbabwe Assemblies of God Africa church in the United Kingdom has been sentenced to 13 years in prison for raping and sexually assaulting a vulnerable woman.

However, the convicted offender, Innocent Majoni, 47, remains at large after failing to appear at Leeds Crown Court for sentencing.

Majoni was found guilty following a trial on three counts of rape and two counts of sexual assault. He was sentenced in his absence as authorities continued efforts to locate him.

The court heard that Majoni deliberately targeted a woman whose immigration status left her vulnerable. He allegedly threatened to report her to the UK Home Office and have her deported unless she submitted to his demands.

“He Called Me Fresh Meat”

In an emotional victim impact statement read before the court, the woman described the fear, humiliation and trauma she continues to experience.

“I still do not feel safe. He forced himself on me. He threatened to go to the Home Office. I came here for safety and ended up in this situation,” she said.

“He called me ‘fresh meat’ and it made me feel dirty. Emotionally, physically and mentally it has impacted me.”

The woman said Majoni’s disappearance has left her constantly fearing for her safety and worrying that other women could also be in danger.

“If he can’t be found and brought to justice, I will never feel safe and will always worry what he is doing to other women,” she said.

“Where is he? I’m still at risk. I’m traumatised by everything.”

Immigration Status Allegedly Used as a Weapon

Recorder of Leeds Guy Kearl KC found that Majoni had exploited the woman’s vulnerable circumstances and used the threat of deportation to control and intimidate her.

The woman reportedly waited several years before reporting the offences because she feared the consequences of approaching authorities while her immigration position remained uncertain.

She only felt safe enough to report what had happened after securing her immigration status.

By the time the criminal case reached its conclusion, Majoni had disappeared.

In addition to the 13-year prison sentence, the judge imposed a lifetime restraining order, meaning any future attempt by Majoni to contact the victim would constitute a separate criminal offence.

Former Care Company Director

UK Companies House records show that Majoni was born in January 1979 and is a Zimbabwean national.

He previously served as a director of ILS24 Health Care Limited, a Leeds-based care company that has since entered liquidation.

Majoni was appointed as a director in July 2013 and resigned in January 2023, according to official company records.

He was also reported to have been a prominent member and elder at the ZAOGA Leeds Assembly.

The church has not been accused of involvement in Majoni’s offences.

Police Search Continues

Majoni’s case has shocked sections of the Zimbabwean community in Britain, particularly because of his reported position of trust within the church and care sectors.

The court praised the victim for finding the courage to come forward despite years of fear and uncertainty.

Her case highlights the difficulties faced by vulnerable migrants who may be afraid to report abuse because offenders threaten them with arrest, deportation or immigration consequences.

Majoni remains wanted, with authorities seeking to bring him into custody so that he can begin serving his 13-year sentence.

Anyone with credible information concerning his whereabouts should contact the relevant UK police authorities rather than approaching him directly.

  • Share:

Info News

Securities Class Action Lawsuit: Investor Rights After Stock Losses

securities class action lawsuit, investor class action lawyer, stock fraud lawsuit, shareholder lawsuit, securities fraud attorney, investment loss lawyer

rnrn

Securities Class Action Lawsuit: Investor Rights After Stock Losses

rnrn

Not every stock loss creates a lawsuit. Markets go up and down. Companies miss earnings. Investors take risks.

rnrn

But when investors lose money because a company allegedly misled the market, hid important information, or made false statements, a securities class action lawsuit may follow.

rnrn

These cases can help shareholders seek recovery after alleged securities fraud.

rnrn

What Is a Securities Class Action?

rnrn

A securities class action is a lawsuit brought on behalf of investors who bought or held securities during a specific period and suffered losses tied to alleged misconduct.

rnrn

The claims may involve:

rnrn

False financial statements
rnMisleading public disclosures
rnHidden risks
rnAccounting fraud
rnInsider misconduct
rnUndisclosed investigations
rnInflated stock price
rnMerger-related misstatements
rnFailure to disclose material information

rnrn

The SEC oversees securities exchanges, brokers, dealers, investment advisers, and mutual funds to promote fair dealing and disclosure of important market information.

rnrn

Who Can Be Included?

rnrn

A securities class may include investors who purchased a company’s stock, bonds, or other securities during a defined class period.

rnrn

Eligibility often depends on:

rnrn

Security purchased
rnPurchase date
rnSale date
rnLoss amount
rnClass period
rnType of claim
rnCourt-approved settlement terms

rnrn

Investors should keep trading records.

rnrn

What Is a Class Period?

rnrn

The class period is the time during which alleged misconduct affected the security price.

rnrn

For example, investors who bought stock between certain dates may be included if they suffered losses after corrective information was disclosed.

rnrn

The class period is critical because it determines who may be eligible.

rnrn

What Must Investors Prove?

rnrn

Securities class actions can be legally complex. Plaintiffs may need to show:

rnrn

A false or misleading statement
rnA material omission
rnScienter, or wrongful state of mind, in some cases
rnReliance
rnLoss causation
rnDamages

rnrn

These cases often require expert economic analysis.

rnrn

Common Triggers for Securities Class Actions

rnrn

Securities lawsuits may follow:

rnrn

Stock price drops
rnRestatements
rnSEC investigations
rnMissed revenue disclosures
rnProduct safety revelations
rnExecutive misconduct
rnAccounting problems
rnCybersecurity failures
rnRegulatory actions
rnMerger disputes
rnBankruptcy-related disclosures

rnrn

A stock drop alone is usually not enough. There must be a legal theory connecting the loss to alleged wrongdoing.

rnrn

Lead Plaintiff Deadline

rnrn

Securities class actions often have lead plaintiff deadlines.

rnrn

The lead plaintiff may help represent the class and work with counsel. Investors with larger losses may seek appointment as lead plaintiff.

rnrn

If you receive notice of a securities lawsuit, pay attention to deadlines.

rnrn

What Can Investors Recover?

rnrn

A settlement may provide cash payments to investors who file valid claims.

rnrn

Payment amounts may depend on:

rnrn

Number of shares
rnPurchase price
rnSale price
rnRecognized loss
rnTotal settlement fund
rnNumber of claims
rnCourt-approved plan of allocation

rnrn

Investors often need brokerage statements to prove transactions.

rnrn

Why Securities Class Actions Are Difficult

rnrn

These cases are heavily litigated. Defendants may argue:

rnrn

Statements were not false
rnRisks were disclosed
rnLosses were caused by market forces
rnThe company lacked wrongful intent
rnInvestors cannot prove reliance
rnClass certification requirements are not met

rnrn

Recent appellate decisions show that certification disputes in securities class actions can be highly technical and closely scrutinized.

rnrn

What Investors Should Do

rnrn

If you think you may be part of a securities class action:

rnrn

Save brokerage records
rnTrack purchase and sale dates
rnSave notices
rnReview class period
rnFile claim forms on time
rnAvoid fake recovery scams
rnSpeak with an attorney if losses are large

rnrn

Final Thoughts

rnrn

A securities class action lawsuit may give investors a way to seek recovery after alleged corporate misconduct.

rnrn

But these cases are complex. Stock losses alone are not enough. Evidence, timing, disclosures, and expert analysis all matter.

rnrn

If you lost significant money after alleged fraud or misleading statements, speak with a qualified securities class action attorney.

rn

Cyber Insurance for Small Business: Coverage Guide

Cyber insurance has moved from a nice-to-have policy to a serious risk management tool for small businesses. Even companies with fewer than 50 employees depend on email, cloud software, online banking, remote access, customer databases, websites, point-of-sale systems, and mobile devices. A single ransomware infection, stolen password, or fraudulent wire request can stop operations and create expensive response costs.

Cyber insurance is designed to help with certain costs after a covered cyber incident. It is not a replacement for good security, but it can support response and recovery when controls fail. The exact coverage depends on the insurer, policy form, endorsements, exclusions, and security requirements.

First-party coverage applies to the business's own losses. This may include breach response, forensic investigation, data restoration, business interruption, ransomware response, crisis communications, legal consultation, and customer notification. If a business cannot operate because systems are locked or cloud access is disrupted, business interruption coverage may help replace covered lost income during the downtime period.

Third-party coverage applies when other people or organizations claim your business caused harm. This may include legal defense, settlements, regulatory investigations, privacy claims, media liability, or contractual claims after a data breach. Businesses that store customer records, health information, financial data, payment information, or confidential client files should pay close attention to this area.

Business email compromise is one of the most important topics to ask about. Many losses now involve fraudulent emails, fake invoices, payroll diversion, vendor impersonation, or wire transfer scams. Some cyber policies cover social engineering or funds transfer fraud only if a special endorsement is added. Others exclude it or provide a lower sublimit. Ask specifically: If an employee is tricked into sending money to a criminal, is that covered?

Ransomware coverage also varies. Some policies may help with negotiation, legal guidance, recovery support, and covered payments where legally allowed. However, insurers may require security controls before offering ransomware coverage. These controls can include multifactor authentication, endpoint detection, backups, patch management, email filtering, employee training, and privileged access restrictions.

Cyber insurance applications have become more detailed. Insurers may ask whether multifactor authentication is used for email, remote access, administrator accounts, and cloud systems. They may ask about backups, encryption, endpoint protection, firewalls, vulnerability scanning, incident response plans, vendor access, and security training. Answer honestly. Inaccurate answers can create problems during a claim.

Not every cyber event is covered. Common exclusions may involve prior known incidents, war or nation-state activity, bodily injury, infrastructure failure, intentional acts, failure to maintain required controls, unencrypted devices, or losses outside policy definitions. Because exclusions can be broad, review the policy with someone who understands cyber risk.

Small businesses should also ask about the insurer's response team. A strong cyber policy is not just a reimbursement document. It should connect the business with breach coaches, forensic firms, ransomware response vendors, public relations support, and legal resources. In an incident, speed matters. Knowing who to call can reduce confusion.

Cyber insurance pricing depends on revenue, industry, data type, employee count, security controls, claims history, remote access, vendor exposure, and coverage limits. Health care, financial services, legal firms, schools, professional services, and e-commerce businesses may face higher scrutiny because they handle sensitive data or payments.

Before buying a policy, map your most important systems. Include email, accounting, online banking, payroll, website hosting, customer records, cloud drives, point-of-sale, remote access, and backup systems. Then compare policy limits against realistic incident costs. A small ransomware event can involve forensics, legal review, overtime, lost revenue, customer notice, and system rebuilds.

Cyber insurance works best when paired with basic security. Use multifactor authentication, strong password management, least privilege access, regular patching, offline or immutable backups, endpoint protection, DNS filtering, email security, vendor reviews, and employee phishing training. Document these controls because insurers may request proof.

For small businesses, cyber insurance is not about fear. It is about resilience. The right policy can help a company recover faster, protect customers, and survive an incident that might otherwise be financially damaging.