MDC Alliance leader Douglas Mwonzora has recalled MDC-T leader Thokozani Khupe from parliament. This was revealed by Khupe during a press conference held on Wednesday.
Khupe said Mwonzora wrote to Mudenda in January notifying him of his intention to recall Khupe.
Said Khupe, "on the 26th of January 2022, I received a letter from the Speaker of Parliament through a courier, FedEx which was delivered to my house in Bulawayo together with my colleague Nomvula Mguni to the effect that we had been recalled and we were no longer Members of Parliament. I have never heard in the history of Parliament a member being recalled through a letter sent to their home by FedEx at a time when Parliament is not in session."
Read the full statement below:
On the 21st of January 2022 a Split of the Movement for Democratic Change-Tsvangirai occurred. This was as a result of constitutional transgressions. Douglas Mwonzora has for times without number, violated the constitution of the party whereas Article 9.1.2 (a) enjoins the President to uphold and defend the party constitution. It therefore follows that the President cannot be at the centre of constitutional transgressions. At the same time, Douglas Mwonzora declared that he was now the leader of MDC Alliance party. This is evidence that we now have two parties, MDC T and the MDC Alliance hence the split.
It was in this vein that l then wrote letters to the Speaker of Parliament and the Minister of Justice on the 24th of January 2022 informing both institutions that the MDC-T party had split into two formations, one led by Dr Thokozani Khupe who is also Leader of the Opposition in the National Assembly and the other led by Douglas Mwonzora, Leader of the Opposition in the Senate and President of the MDC Alliance party. I appealed to the Speaker of the National Assembly and the Ministry of Justice, Legal and Parliamentary Affairs to treat both formations equally and exercise impartiality.
However, to my surprise on the 26th of January 2022, I received a letter from the Speaker of Parliament through a courier, FedEx which was delivered to my house in Bulawayo together with my colleague Nomvula Mguni to the effect that we had been recalled and we were no longer Members of Parliament. I have never heard in the history of Parliament a member being recalled through a letter sent to their home by FedEx at a time when Parliament is not in session.
Parliament will be resuming in a fortnight and you shudder to think why the Speaker of Parliament was in such a hurry to recall me by a letter he wrote whilst sitting in his office and sending it through FedEx. That is unprocedural. My understanding of Parliamentary operations, is that the Speaker derives his powers from the mace when he is sitting on his chair in the House of Assembly and in the presence of seating Members of Parliament because the mace is the symbol of authority of the House and the Speaker. Without the mace the House cannot sit and pass laws.
On the 24th of January 2022, the Speaker of Parliament received two letters, one from my party and another from Mwonzora's party. He then decided to ignore my party's letter and took immediate action on Mwonzora's party letter of which he subsequently wrote recall letters to us. My letter was reconciliatory because I was pleading with the Speaker of Parliament to exercise impartiality and treat the two parties fairly whereas Mwonzora's letter was vindictive because he was asking the Speaker of Parliament to recall Nomvula Mguni and myself. Douglas Mwonzora is now President of MDC-Alliance party whereas Honourable Mguni and myself are members of the MDC-T party. It boggles the mind how a leader of another political party can recall members of another party. For example, MDC-T party cannot recall members of PDP neither can they recall members of ZANU-PF.
To make matters worse the Speaker of Parliament in the recall letters he said, I quote, "I must advise that on the 24th of January 2022, I received a notice of recall in terms of section 129 (1) (k) of the Constitution. Accordingly I must advise that by virtue of Section 129 (1) (k) of the constitution you have seized to be a member of the National Assembly." My question is which party because the Speaker did not mention the name of the party which gave him those notices.
Previously there are members of Parliament who were recalled because they were accused of being members of MDC-Alliance party. On the country Mwonzora made a public announcement to the effect that he has now formed a new party that is contesting the upcoming by-elections in March under the MDC Alliance banner, whereas this is the reason why other MPs were recalled, it was precisely because they belonged to the MDC Alliance and not MDC-T. Hence the reason why he has expelled himself from the party in terms of the MDC-T constitution, Article 5.10 (a).
Therefore, Douglas Mwonzora has no locus standi of recalling a member of the MDC-T because he is now a member and the leader of the MDC- Alliance. This clearly demonstrates the bias, impartiality and inconsistence by the Speaker of Parliament.
Splits in the Movement for Democratic Change are not a new phenomena. The first split happened in 2005 between the late Gibson Sibanda, Deputy President and the late Morgan Tsvangirai, the President.
Parliament recognized and respected both formations and accepted the status quo. Both formations were allowed to co-exist and they co-existed until the end of their term of office in 2008.
This is where my issue of victimization and discrimination is derived from.
Two men split in 2005 and they were allowed to co-exist by this same institution.
A woman and a man have split in 2022 that is Thokozani Khupe and Douglas Mwonzora. The Speaker of Parliament then decides to favour Douglas Mwonzora over me without even considering calling both parties to the table for a discussion. Truly speaking this is glaring evidence of inequality, discrimination and victimisation.
There is no provision in the Standing Rules and Orders where the Speaker of Parliament is supposed to supervise political parties and adjudicate when they have a dispute.
The Speaker of Parliament in this instance received two letters on the same day and almost at the same time, but alas he decided on which formation was legitimate, l wonder where he got those powers from.
The Speaker of Parliament knew very well that Mwonzora had declared that he was now leader of the MDC Alliance party and that he was going to participate in the by-elections under the MDC Alliance party. There is evidence for all to see because his candidates for the March 26 2022 by-elections have registered under MDC Alliance. This is the same party whose MPs were recalled from Parliament because they had seized to be members of the MDC-T.
The Speaker of Parliament in his wisdom disregarded that and decided to take sides with another man. As a woman, I strongly feel victimised and discriminated against at the highest level.
As if that was not enough, the Minister of Justice equally decided that the Political Parties Grant will go to Mwonzora. Again, l wonder where the Minister of Justice derives his powers from to decide on which formation is legitimate as l also wrote a letter to him advising him on the new developments in the party and pleaded with him to treat both formations in a fair and just manner.
In 2014, the MDC-T split again and this time it was between the late Morgan Tsvangirai, President and Tendai Biti, the Secretary General. Political Parties funds were split between the two formations.
In 2022, the same MDC-T party has split between Thokozani Khupe, Deputy President and Douglas Mwonzora, President but the sad reality is that the Minister of Justice wants to give the full amount to Mwonzora and one shudders to think why.
When it was Morgan Tsvangirai and Tendai Biti the money was divided into two but this time around because it is Thokozani Khupe, a woman and Mwonzora, a man, the Minister of Justice wants the full amount to go to Mwonzora. Surely what can one call this other than seeing it as an unjustified inequality and an unfair practice.
In these two instances l have been discriminated against because I am a Woman.
It is very clear that when it comes to my case, there is selective application of rules and regulations. When it was Morgan Tsvangirai and Gibson Sibanda they were both respected and treated with impartiality. Again when it was Tendai Biti and Morgan Tsvangirai they were respected and treated with impartiality.
This time around it is Thokozani Khupe and Douglas Mwonzora and both the Speaker of Parliament and the Minister of Justice have decided to side with another man, Mwonzora for no apparent reason.
In my view, these institutions, namely the Executive and the Legislature are not exercising impartiality and colluding against me with regards to this matter.
As women in the political arena in this country we have been victimised and discriminated against for times without number and time has come for women to rise and say this far and no further. Our voices are being silenced and we are being disempowered.
I met with Women's Organisations to tell them our story of victimisation and discrimination just because of our gender. I am being suffocated and I Can't Breathe.
At the same time, l have written to the United Nations Secretary General H.E. Antonio Guterres, the UN Women Executive Director Dr. Sima Sami Bahous, the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights H.E Michelle Bachelet, the Inter Parliamentary Union President Honourable Duarte Pacheco, the Pan-African Parliament and Madam Bineta Diop, Special Envoy of the Chairperson of the African Union Commission on Women, Peace and Security so that they see the amount of victimisation and discrimination against women by the Executive and the Legislature.
I am therefore calling upon the Executive to Stop discrimination against women. By the same token, l am calling upon the legislature to Stop discrimination against women. I am saying this with a heart which is bleeding because I am a victim of discrimination by these pillars of the State. Women and men must be treated with dignity, respect and equality because we are all equal in the eyes of the Lord, therefore we must all be equal in the eyes of the Law.
I would like to conclude by calling on Women's organizations and women at large to rise and fight with me this deadly Pandemic called Victimization and Discrimination against women in politics. l am going to fight to the finish. I will fight discrimination against women with the last drop of my tears. I will fight discrimination against women with the last drop of my sweat. I will fight discrimination against women with the last drop of my blood, not just for myself but for young women who should not be intimidated but should be inspired to commit without shame in the politics of this country and help shape their destinies.
I rest my case.
Dr Thokozani Khupe
2 February 2022
Info News
Truck Accident Lawyer: How to Get Maximum Compensation
Truck Accident Lawyer: How to Get Maximum Compensation
A truck accident can be far more serious than a regular car crash. Large commercial trucks can cause severe injuries, major property damage, and long-term financial problems. If you were injured in a crash involving a semi-truck, delivery truck, or commercial vehicle, a truck accident lawyer can help you understand your legal options.
Truck accident cases are often complicated because more than one party may be responsible. The truck driver, trucking company, maintenance provider, cargo loader, or vehicle manufacturer may all be involved. A skilled semi-truck accident attorney can investigate the case and identify who may be liable.
Why Truck Accident Claims Are Different
Commercial trucking companies usually have strong insurance companies and legal teams. They may start investigating the crash immediately. This is why victims should not rely only on the insurance company’s version of events.
A lawyer can help collect driver logs, black box data, inspection records, maintenance history, delivery schedules, and accident reports. These records may show whether the truck driver was speeding, tired, distracted, overloaded, or violating safety rules.
Compensation After a Truck Accident
A trucking accident claim may include medical bills, lost wages, future treatment, pain and suffering, emotional distress, vehicle damage, and long-term care. If the injury is permanent, the settlement may also include loss of future income.
Final Thoughts
A commercial truck accident can change your life quickly. Working with a truck accident lawyer can help you fight for fair compensation and avoid being pressured into a low settlement.
Cyber Insurance for Small Business: Coverage Guide
Cyber insurance has moved from a nice-to-have policy to a serious risk management tool for small businesses. Even companies with fewer than 50 employees depend on email, cloud software, online banking, remote access, customer databases, websites, point-of-sale systems, and mobile devices. A single ransomware infection, stolen password, or fraudulent wire request can stop operations and create expensive response costs.
Cyber insurance is designed to help with certain costs after a covered cyber incident. It is not a replacement for good security, but it can support response and recovery when controls fail. The exact coverage depends on the insurer, policy form, endorsements, exclusions, and security requirements.
First-party coverage applies to the business's own losses. This may include breach response, forensic investigation, data restoration, business interruption, ransomware response, crisis communications, legal consultation, and customer notification. If a business cannot operate because systems are locked or cloud access is disrupted, business interruption coverage may help replace covered lost income during the downtime period.
Third-party coverage applies when other people or organizations claim your business caused harm. This may include legal defense, settlements, regulatory investigations, privacy claims, media liability, or contractual claims after a data breach. Businesses that store customer records, health information, financial data, payment information, or confidential client files should pay close attention to this area.
Business email compromise is one of the most important topics to ask about. Many losses now involve fraudulent emails, fake invoices, payroll diversion, vendor impersonation, or wire transfer scams. Some cyber policies cover social engineering or funds transfer fraud only if a special endorsement is added. Others exclude it or provide a lower sublimit. Ask specifically: If an employee is tricked into sending money to a criminal, is that covered?
Ransomware coverage also varies. Some policies may help with negotiation, legal guidance, recovery support, and covered payments where legally allowed. However, insurers may require security controls before offering ransomware coverage. These controls can include multifactor authentication, endpoint detection, backups, patch management, email filtering, employee training, and privileged access restrictions.
Cyber insurance applications have become more detailed. Insurers may ask whether multifactor authentication is used for email, remote access, administrator accounts, and cloud systems. They may ask about backups, encryption, endpoint protection, firewalls, vulnerability scanning, incident response plans, vendor access, and security training. Answer honestly. Inaccurate answers can create problems during a claim.
Not every cyber event is covered. Common exclusions may involve prior known incidents, war or nation-state activity, bodily injury, infrastructure failure, intentional acts, failure to maintain required controls, unencrypted devices, or losses outside policy definitions. Because exclusions can be broad, review the policy with someone who understands cyber risk.
Small businesses should also ask about the insurer's response team. A strong cyber policy is not just a reimbursement document. It should connect the business with breach coaches, forensic firms, ransomware response vendors, public relations support, and legal resources. In an incident, speed matters. Knowing who to call can reduce confusion.
Cyber insurance pricing depends on revenue, industry, data type, employee count, security controls, claims history, remote access, vendor exposure, and coverage limits. Health care, financial services, legal firms, schools, professional services, and e-commerce businesses may face higher scrutiny because they handle sensitive data or payments.
Before buying a policy, map your most important systems. Include email, accounting, online banking, payroll, website hosting, customer records, cloud drives, point-of-sale, remote access, and backup systems. Then compare policy limits against realistic incident costs. A small ransomware event can involve forensics, legal review, overtime, lost revenue, customer notice, and system rebuilds.
Cyber insurance works best when paired with basic security. Use multifactor authentication, strong password management, least privilege access, regular patching, offline or immutable backups, endpoint protection, DNS filtering, email security, vendor reviews, and employee phishing training. Document these controls because insurers may request proof.
For small businesses, cyber insurance is not about fear. It is about resilience. The right policy can help a company recover faster, protect customers, and survive an incident that might otherwise be financially damaging.
