Saturday, October 17

Mwonzora Expels Thokozani Khupe From Parliament

MDC Alliance leader Douglas Mwonzora has recalled MDC-T leader Thokozani Khupe from parliament. This was revealed by Khupe during a press conference held on Wednesday.

Khupe said Mwonzora wrote to Mudenda in January notifying him of his intention to recall Khupe.

Said Khupe, "on the 26th of January 2022, I received a letter from the Speaker of Parliament through a courier, FedEx which was delivered to my house in Bulawayo together with my colleague Nomvula Mguni to the effect that we had been recalled and we were no longer Members of Parliament.  I have never heard in the history of Parliament a member being recalled through a letter sent to their home by FedEx at a time when Parliament is not in session."

Read the full statement below:

On the 21st of January 2022 a Split of the Movement for Democratic Change-Tsvangirai occurred.  This was as a result of constitutional transgressions.   Douglas Mwonzora has for times without number, violated the constitution of the party whereas Article 9.1.2 (a) enjoins the President to uphold and defend the party constitution.   It therefore follows that the President cannot be at the centre of constitutional transgressions. At the same time, Douglas Mwonzora declared that he was now the leader of MDC Alliance party. This is evidence that we now have two parties, MDC T and the MDC Alliance hence the split.

It was in this vein that l then wrote letters to the Speaker of Parliament and the Minister of Justice on the 24th of January 2022 informing both institutions that the MDC-T party had split into two formations, one led by Dr Thokozani Khupe who is also Leader of the Opposition in the National Assembly and the other led by Douglas Mwonzora, Leader of the Opposition in the Senate and President of the MDC Alliance party. I appealed to the Speaker of the National Assembly and the Ministry of Justice, Legal and Parliamentary Affairs to treat both formations equally and exercise impartiality.

However, to my surprise on the 26th of January 2022, I received a letter from the Speaker of Parliament through a courier, FedEx which was delivered to my house in Bulawayo together with my colleague Nomvula Mguni to the effect that we had been recalled and we were no longer Members of Parliament.  I have never heard in the history of Parliament a member being recalled through a letter sent to their home by FedEx at a time when Parliament is not in session.

Parliament will be resuming in a fortnight and you shudder to think why the Speaker of Parliament was in such a hurry to recall me by a letter he wrote whilst sitting in his office and sending it through FedEx.  That is unprocedural. My understanding of Parliamentary operations, is that the Speaker derives his powers from the mace when he is sitting on his chair in the House of Assembly and in the presence of seating Members of Parliament because the mace is the symbol of authority of the House and the Speaker.  Without the mace the House cannot sit and pass laws.

On the 24th of January 2022, the Speaker of Parliament received two letters, one from my party and another from Mwonzora's party.  He then decided to ignore my party's letter and took immediate action on Mwonzora's party letter of which he subsequently wrote recall letters to us.  My letter was reconciliatory because I was pleading with the Speaker  of Parliament to exercise impartiality and treat the two parties fairly whereas Mwonzora's letter was vindictive because he was asking the Speaker of Parliament to recall Nomvula Mguni and myself. Douglas Mwonzora is now President of MDC-Alliance party whereas Honourable Mguni and myself are members of the MDC-T party. It boggles the mind how a leader of another political party can recall members of another party. For example, MDC-T party  cannot recall members of PDP neither can they recall members of ZANU-PF.

To make matters worse the Speaker of Parliament in the recall letters he said, I quote, "I must advise that on the 24th of January 2022, I received a notice of recall in terms of section 129 (1) (k) of the Constitution. Accordingly I must advise that by virtue of Section 129 (1) (k) of the constitution you have seized to be a member of the National Assembly."   My question is which party because the Speaker did not mention the name of the party which gave him those notices.

Previously there are members of Parliament who were recalled because they were accused of being members of MDC-Alliance party. On the country Mwonzora made a public announcement to the effect that he has now formed a new party that is contesting the upcoming by-elections in March under the MDC Alliance banner, whereas this is the reason why other MPs were recalled, it was precisely because they belonged to the MDC Alliance and not MDC-T. Hence the reason why he has expelled himself from the party in terms of the MDC-T constitution, Article 5.10 (a).

Therefore, Douglas Mwonzora has no locus standi of recalling a member of the MDC-T because he is now a member and the leader of the MDC- Alliance. This clearly demonstrates the bias, impartiality and inconsistence by the Speaker of Parliament.

Splits in the Movement for Democratic Change are not a new phenomena. The first split happened in 2005 between the late Gibson Sibanda, Deputy President and the late Morgan Tsvangirai, the President.

Parliament recognized and respected both formations and accepted the status quo.  Both formations were allowed to co-exist and they co-existed until the end of their term of office in 2008.

This is where my issue of victimization and discrimination is derived from.

Two men split in 2005 and they were allowed to co-exist by this same institution.

A woman and a man have split in 2022 that is Thokozani Khupe and Douglas Mwonzora.  The Speaker of Parliament then decides to favour Douglas Mwonzora over me without even considering calling both parties to the table for a discussion.  Truly speaking this is glaring evidence of inequality, discrimination and victimisation.

There is no provision in the Standing Rules and Orders where the Speaker of Parliament is supposed to supervise political parties and adjudicate when they have a dispute.

The Speaker of Parliament in this instance received two letters on the same day and almost at the same time, but alas he decided on which formation was legitimate, l wonder where he got those powers from.
The Speaker of Parliament knew very well that Mwonzora had declared that he was now leader of the MDC Alliance party and that he was going to participate in the by-elections under the MDC Alliance party. There is evidence for all to see because his candidates for the March 26 2022 by-elections have registered under MDC Alliance.   This is the same party whose MPs were recalled from Parliament because they had seized to be members of the MDC-T.

The Speaker of Parliament in his wisdom disregarded that and decided to take sides with another man. As a woman, I strongly feel victimised and discriminated against at the highest level.

As if that was not enough, the Minister of Justice equally decided that the Political Parties Grant will go to Mwonzora.  Again, l wonder where the Minister of Justice derives his powers from to decide on which formation is legitimate as l also wrote a letter to him advising him on the new developments in the party and pleaded with him to treat both formations in a fair and just manner.

In 2014, the MDC-T split again and this time it was between the late Morgan Tsvangirai, President and Tendai Biti, the Secretary General.  Political Parties funds were split between  the two formations.

In 2022, the same MDC-T party has split between Thokozani Khupe, Deputy President and Douglas Mwonzora, President but the sad reality is that the Minister of Justice wants to give the full amount to Mwonzora and one shudders to think why.

When it was Morgan Tsvangirai and Tendai Biti the money was divided into two but this time around because it is Thokozani Khupe, a woman and Mwonzora, a man,  the Minister  of Justice wants the full amount to go to Mwonzora.  Surely what can one call this other than seeing it as an unjustified inequality and an unfair practice.

In these two instances l have been discriminated against because I am a Woman.

It is very clear that when it comes to my case, there is selective application of rules and regulations. When it was Morgan Tsvangirai and Gibson Sibanda they were both respected and treated with impartiality.  Again when it was Tendai Biti and Morgan Tsvangirai they were respected and treated with impartiality.

This time around it is Thokozani Khupe and Douglas Mwonzora and both the Speaker of Parliament and the Minister of Justice have decided to side with another man, Mwonzora for no apparent reason.

In my view, these institutions, namely the Executive and the Legislature are not exercising impartiality and colluding against me with regards to this matter.

As women  in the political arena in this country we have been victimised and discriminated against for times without number and time has come for women to rise and say this far and no further. Our voices are being silenced and  we are being disempowered.

I met with Women's Organisations to tell them our story of victimisation and discrimination just because of our gender. I am being suffocated and I Can't Breathe.

At the same time, l have written to the United Nations Secretary General H.E. Antonio Guterres, the UN Women Executive Director Dr. Sima Sami Bahous,  the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights H.E Michelle Bachelet, the Inter Parliamentary Union President Honourable Duarte Pacheco, the Pan-African Parliament and Madam Bineta Diop, Special Envoy of the Chairperson of the African Union Commission on Women, Peace and Security so that they see the amount of victimisation and discrimination against women by the Executive and the Legislature.


I am therefore calling upon the Executive to Stop discrimination  against women. By the same token,  l am calling upon the legislature to Stop discrimination against women. I am saying this with a heart which is bleeding because I am a victim of discrimination by these pillars of the State. Women and men must be treated with dignity, respect and equality because we are all equal in the eyes of the Lord, therefore we must all be equal in the eyes of the Law.

I would like to conclude by calling on Women's organizations and women at large to rise and fight with me this deadly Pandemic called Victimization and Discrimination against women in politics. l am going to fight to the finish.  I will fight discrimination against women with the last drop of my tears. I will fight discrimination against women with the last drop of my sweat. I will fight discrimination against women with the last drop of my blood, not just for myself but for young women who should not be intimidated but should be inspired to commit without shame in the politics of this country and help shape their destinies.

I rest my case.
Dr Thokozani Khupe
2 February 2022

  • Share:

Info News

Mesothelioma Wrongful Death Lawyer: Legal Help for Families

mesothelioma wrongful death lawyer, asbestos wrongful death attorney, mesothelioma death claim, asbestos death lawsuit, wrongful death asbestos claim

rnrn

Mesothelioma Wrongful Death Lawyer: Legal Help for Families

rnrn

Losing a loved one to mesothelioma is heartbreaking. Families may be left with medical bills, funeral costs, lost income, grief, and unanswered questions about where asbestos exposure happened.

rnrn

A mesothelioma wrongful death lawyer helps surviving family members pursue claims against companies responsible for asbestos exposure.

rnrn

These cases are time-sensitive, and the rules vary by state.

rnrn

What Is a Mesothelioma Wrongful Death Claim?

rnrn

A wrongful death claim is a legal claim filed after a person dies because of another party’s wrongful conduct.

rnrn

In mesothelioma cases, the claim usually alleges that asbestos exposure caused the disease and that companies failed to warn or protect people from asbestos dangers.

rnrn

Who Can File?

rnrn

Depending on state law, eligible parties may include:

rnrn

Spouse
rnChildren
rnParents
rnEstate representative
rnPersonal representative
rnOther dependents or heirs

rnrn

A lawyer can explain who has authority to file in your state.

rnrn

What Damages May Be Available?

rnrn

A wrongful death claim may seek compensation for:

rnrn

Medical expenses before death
rnFuneral expenses
rnBurial costs
rnLost income
rnLoss of financial support
rnLoss of companionship
rnPain and suffering, where allowed
rnLoss of household services
rnFamily emotional losses

rnrn

State law controls what damages are available.

rnrn

What Evidence Is Needed?

rnrn

Families may need:

rnrn

Death certificate
rnMedical records
rnPathology report
rnWork history
rnMilitary records
rnExposure history
rnMarriage certificate
rnBirth certificates
rnEstate documents
rnFuneral bills
rnIncome records
rnWitness statements

rnrn

If the patient gave deposition testimony before death, that testimony may be important.

rnrn

What If the Patient Never Filed a Lawsuit?

rnrn

A family may still have legal options even if the patient did not file a lawsuit while alive.

rnrn

However, deadlines may be short. The statute of limitations may run from the date of death or another date depending on state law.

rnrn

Asbestos Trust Fund Wrongful Death Claims

rnrn

Some asbestos bankruptcy trusts allow wrongful death claims.

rnrn

Trust claims may require:

rnrn

Medical diagnosis
rnExposure evidence
rnProof of death
rnFamily relationship documents
rnEstate authority
rnWork history
rnProduct or jobsite evidence

rnrn

Why Families Should Act Quickly

rnrn

Waiting can make the case harder because:

rnrn

Documents may be lost
rnWitnesses may become unavailable
rnWork history may be harder to confirm
rnLegal deadlines may expire
rnTrust rules may change
rnMedical records may take time to obtain

rnrn

Final Thoughts

rnrn

A mesothelioma wrongful death lawyer can help families seek accountability after asbestos-related cancer takes a loved one’s life.

rnrn

No legal claim can replace the person you lost. But compensation may help with medical bills, funeral costs, lost income, and family support.

rnrn

If your loved one died from mesothelioma, speak with an experienced asbestos lawyer quickly to protect your family’s rights.

rn

Best Cloud Backup Solutions for Law Firms in 2026

Law firms are becoming major cyberattack targets.

rnrn

Why?

rnrn

Because legal firms store extremely sensitive information.

rnrn

Client contracts. Financial records. Litigation strategies. Corporate merger documents. Confidential communications.

rnrn

One ransomware attack can lock critical files and completely disrupt operations.

rnrn

That’s why more firms are investing heavily in the best cloud backup solutions for law firms in 2026.

rnrn

The old approach of storing files on a single local server is becoming dangerously outdated.

rnrn

Why Law Firms Face Unique Cybersecurity Risks

rnrn

Legal practices operate differently from many other businesses.

rnrn

Attorneys often work remotely, exchange confidential documents constantly, and manage enormous amounts of private client information.

rnrn

That creates multiple attack surfaces.

rnrn

Cybercriminals know:

rnrn
    rn
  • Law firms hold valuable data
  • rn
  • Smaller firms may lack advanced cybersecurity
  • rn
  • Downtime creates pressure to pay ransoms quickly
  • rn
  • Sensitive legal files can be exploited
  • rn
rnrn

The risks continue growing every year.

rnrn

What Makes a Strong Cloud Backup Solution?

rnrn

Not every backup platform provides real protection.

rnrn

Some systems create a dangerous false sense of security.

rnrn

Experienced IT teams evaluate several critical areas.

rnrn

Immutable Backups

rnrn

Immutable storage prevents attackers from altering or deleting backup files.

rnrn

This matters enormously during ransomware attacks.

rnrn

Without immutable backups, attackers may encrypt both primary systems and backup copies.

rnrn

That leaves businesses trapped.

rnrn

Geographic Redundancy

rnrn

Strong backup systems store data across multiple locations.

rnrn

If one data center fails, systems can still recover quickly.

rnrn

Law firms handling high-value litigation often require advanced redundancy protections.

rnrn

Encryption Standards

rnrn

Client confidentiality matters.

rnrn

Cloud backup providers should offer:

rnrn
    rn
  • End-to-end encryption
  • rn
  • Encrypted file transfers
  • rn
  • Secure access controls
  • rn
  • Multi-factor authentication
  • rn
rnrn

Weak security practices can create massive legal liability.

rnrn

Compliance Requirements for Legal Firms

rnrn

Law firms increasingly face compliance obligations involving:

rnrn
    rn
  • Client confidentiality
  • rn
  • Data privacy laws
  • rn
  • Document retention policies
  • rn
  • Industry regulations
  • rn
rnrn

Cloud providers must align with these requirements.

rnrn

Choosing the cheapest solution without compliance review can become a major mistake.

rnrn

Common Backup Mistakes Law Firms Make

rnrn

Some firms assume cloud synchronization automatically equals backup.

rnrn

That assumption creates problems.

rnrn

If ransomware encrypts synchronized files, corrupted versions may spread instantly across systems.

rnrn

Other common mistakes include:

rnrn
    rn
  • Failing to test backups regularly
  • rn
  • Weak password management
  • rn
  • Limited employee cybersecurity training
  • rn
  • No incident response planning
  • rn
rnrn

Technology alone is never enough.

rnrn

Why Managed Backup Services Are Growing

rnrn

Many law firms now outsource backup management to specialized providers.

rnrn

Managed services may help with:

rnrn
    rn
  • Continuous monitoring
  • rn
  • Threat detection
  • rn
  • Recovery testing
  • rn
  • Compliance management
  • rn
  • Disaster recovery planning
  • rn
rnrn

That expertise becomes valuable during serious cyber incidents.

rnrn

Final Takeaway

rnrn

The best cloud backup solutions for law firms in 2026 combine security, redundancy, compliance support, and rapid recovery capabilities.

rnrn

Law firms can no longer treat backups as a simple IT task.

rnrn

Data protection has become essential for business continuity, client trust, and long-term operational survival.

rnrn

FAQ

rnrn

Why are law firms targeted by ransomware attacks?

rnrn

Law firms store highly sensitive data and often face pressure to restore systems quickly.

rnrn

What is immutable backup storage?

rnrn

Immutable storage prevents backup files from being altered or deleted.

rnrn

Are cloud backups enough for cybersecurity?

rnrn

No. Businesses also need strong access controls, employee training, and incident response planning.

rn