Monday, June 01

Mai TT Wants US$200,000 Defamation Damages From Evidence Chihera

Controversial social media personality and comedienne Mai Titi has demanded a massive US$200,000 in defamation damages from media personality Evidence Jiri who is better known as “Chihera” in social media circles.

Mai Titi, real name Felistus Murata Edwards, is alleging that Chihera defamed her on social media platforms by calling her a “whore and a slut who was a bed-hopper” in a series of live videos on Facebook.

Chihera who started as a gospel singer before dumping preaching for the lures of being a thigh vendor and media personality is alleged to have used derogatory vulgar language to insult Mai Titi. The erstwhile gospel musician is further alleged to have threatened to physically harm Mai Titi.
Mai Titi has since enlisted the services of lawyers, Machiridza Commercial Law Chambers to seek redress from Chihera. The lawyers have written to Chihera demanding that she pull down all the offending videos. They have also informed her that they will soon be filing a defamation lawsuit demanding US$200,000 in defamation damages.

iHarare is publishing the letter of demand written by Mai Titi’s lawyers to Evidence “Chihera” Jiri below in its entirety.
Ironically, Mai Titi has also been on the receiving end of such a lawsuit.

Last year Mai Titi was slapped with a ZWL$500,000 defamation lawsuit by one of her former friends Memory Muyaka. Muyaka who is the owner of Khloe’s Home Decor (Private) Limited alleged that the comedian had defamed her by calling her ” a prostitute, a witch and a gossiper” on social media platforms. Muyaka, who is also known as Mai Ma Curtain, further alleged that Mai Titi falsely accused her and three others (Prophet Passion Java, Tyra ‘Madam Boss’ Chikocho and Wanisai ‘Mahwindo’ Mutandwa) of wanting to kill her.

The matter was heard before Harare High Court judge Justice Edith Mushore who after going through the records and hearing from Muyaka’s legal counsel ordered Mai Titi to pay the $500 000 damages that her former friend was demanding. Justice Mushore also slapped Mai Titi with the costs of the lawsuit and ordered that she should pay the $500 000 at the prescribed interest rate starting from the day of judgment to the date of full payment.

  • Share:

Info News

Solar Panel Installation in 2026: Save Energy and Reduce Costs

Introduction

rnrn

Solar energy is becoming one of the most popular renewable solutions for homeowners and businesses. Searching for “solar panel installation” indicates strong intent from users ready to invest.

rnrn
rn

Benefits of Solar Energy

rnrn
    rn
  • Lower electricity bills
  • rn
  • Environmental benefits
  • rn
  • Government incentives
  • rn
rnrn
rn

Cost and ROI

rnrn

Initial costs can be high, but long-term savings make solar worthwhile.

rnrn
rn

Choosing a Solar Provider

rnrn

Look for:

rnrn
    rn
  • Experience
  • rn
  • Certifications
  • rn
  • Warranty
  • rn
rnrn
rn

Future Trends

rnrn

Battery storage and smart grids are shaping the industry.

rnrn
rn

FAQ

rnrn

How long do solar panels last?
rnTypically 25–30 years.

rn

DUI Defense Lawyer: Common Legal Defenses in Drunk Driving Cases

DUI defense lawyer, DUI defenses, drunk driving defense, DUI attorney, beat DUI charge, DUI case defense, DUI evidence

rnrn

DUI Defense Lawyer: Common Legal Defenses in Drunk Driving Cases

rnrn

A DUI arrest is not the same as a conviction. Prosecutors must prove the case, and the defense has the right to challenge the evidence.

rnrn

A DUI defense lawyer looks for legal, factual, and technical problems in the government’s case.

rnrn

Every DUI case is different. Some defenses focus on the traffic stop. Others focus on field sobriety tests, chemical testing, officer procedure, or whether the person was actually impaired.

rnrn

Defense 1: Illegal Traffic Stop

rnrn

Police usually need a legal reason to stop a driver.

rnrn

Possible stop reasons include:

rnrn

Speeding
rnSwerving
rnRunning a red light
rnExpired tag
rnEquipment violation
rnAccident investigation
rnReasonable suspicion of impaired driving

rnrn

If the stop was not legally justified, evidence gathered after the stop may be challenged.

rnrn

Defense 2: No Probable Cause for Arrest

rnrn

Even if the stop was legal, the officer must have enough evidence to make a DUI arrest.

rnrn

A lawyer may review:

rnrn

Driving behavior
rnOfficer observations
rnSpeech
rnBalance
rnOdor of alcohol
rnField sobriety tests
rnStatements
rnVideo evidence
rnMedical conditions

rnrn

If probable cause was weak, the arrest may be challenged.

rnrn

Defense 3: Field Sobriety Test Problems

rnrn

Field sobriety tests are not always reliable.

rnrn

A person may perform poorly because of:

rnrn

Medical conditions
rnAnxiety
rnFatigue
rnAge
rnInjury
rnPoor footwear
rnUneven ground
rnWeather
rnBad instructions
rnLanguage barriers

rnrn

A DUI lawyer may compare the officer’s report to body camera or dash camera video.

rnrn

Defense 4: Breath Test Issues

rnrn

Breath testing can be challenged if the machine or procedure was flawed.

rnrn

Potential issues include:

rnrn

Improper calibration
rnLack of maintenance
rnOfficer certification problems
rnMouth alcohol
rnVomiting or burping before test
rnMedical conditions
rnImproper observation period
rnRadio frequency interference claims
rnTesting outside required time windows

rnrn

A breath result is only as strong as the procedure behind it.

rnrn

Defense 5: Blood Test Problems

rnrn

Blood tests may be challenged based on:

rnrn

Improper blood draw
rnContamination
rnChain of custody
rnStorage problems
rnLab errors
rnFermentation
rnTesting delays
rnDocumentation gaps
rnQualified person requirements

rnrn

A lawyer may request lab records and review whether the sample was handled properly.

rnrn

Defense 6: Rising Blood Alcohol

rnrn

A rising blood alcohol defense argues that the person’s BAC was lower while driving and rose by the time of testing.

rnrn

This may be relevant when there is a delay between the stop and the chemical test.

rnrn

The defense depends on drinking timeline, food intake, body weight, test timing, and expert analysis.

rnrn

Defense 7: Medical Conditions

rnrn

Some medical conditions can affect DUI evidence.

rnrn

Examples may include:

rnrn

Diabetes
rnAcid reflux
rnNeurological disorders
rnBalance disorders
rnEye conditions
rnInjuries
rnFatigue
rnAnxiety
rnMedication side effects

rnrn

A medical issue does not automatically defeat a DUI charge, but it may explain certain observations.

rnrn

Defense 8: Not Actually Driving

rnrn

Some cases involve people found in parked vehicles.

rnrn

Legal issues may include:

rnrn

Was the person driving?
rnWas the engine on?
rnWhere were the keys?
rnWas the vehicle operable?
rnWas the person sleeping?
rnDid anyone witness driving?

rnrn

State laws vary on what counts as driving or actual physical control.

rnrn

Defense 9: Police Report vs. Video Evidence

rnrn

Police reports sometimes make a case look stronger than video shows.

rnrn

A DUI lawyer may review:

rnrn

Body camera footage
rnDash camera footage
rnBooking video
rnRoadside testing video
rnAudio recordings
rnJail observation video

rnrn

Video can confirm or contradict officer claims.

rnrn

Defense 10: Constitutional Violations

rnrn

A DUI case may involve constitutional issues such as:

rnrn

Unlawful stop
rnUnlawful search
rnImproper questioning
rnViolation of rights
rnImproper detention
rnLack of warrant where required

rnrn

A lawyer may file motions to suppress evidence if legal rights were violated.

rnrn

Final Thoughts

rnrn

A DUI defense lawyer does not rely on one-size-fits-all arguments. The defense depends on the evidence.

rnrn

Traffic stop, arrest procedure, field sobriety testing, chemical testing, video evidence, and constitutional issues all matter.

rnrn

If you are charged with DUI, get the evidence reviewed before deciding what to do next.

rn