Monday, August 03

Chamisa Taking Mnangagwa Back To ConCourt Tine Humboo Takabirwa MaElections

Chamisa in fresh ConCourt appeal

Opposition MDC leader Nelson Chamisa will launch a renewed bid to oust President Emmerson Mnangagwa by seeking to have the Constitutional Court (ConCourt) review its own judgment based on “new evidence.”

Chamisa’s lawyer Thabani Mpofu said after studying academic works on the elections published by self-exiled former minister Jonathan Moyo, they were now making efforts to have the judgment on the 2018 presidential elections set aside. The country’s top court ruled that Chamisa had failed to prove allegations of fraud during the presidential election, a vote which left the nation polarised and violence on the streets of the capital Harare.

Mpofu said the basis of approaching the ConCourt was because they now believe that the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission (Zec) presented to the courts false information and, therefore, their call for the judgment to be set aside.

“The general rule is that once a final judgment or order has been given, the judge who gave it or any other judge of parallel jurisdiction has no power to alter, rescind, vary or set it aside, except in the few instances recognised at common law or by the rules of the High Court.

“One of the exceptions recognised at common law is when the judgment or order has been obtained through fraudulent misrepresentation,” Mpofu said in a statement yesterday.

Mpofu, who was Chamisa’s lead lawyer in the challenge against Mnangagwa’s presidency, said the information carried in Moyo’s book Excelgate would have consequences on the resolution of the legitimacy question in Zimbabwe.

“We have now completed our sober and painstaking study of Excelgate. In embarking on the study, we allowed ourselves to be guided by the remarks of (Justice Luke) Malaba (as he was then) in City of Mutare v Mawoyo 1995 … doubles, Excelgate comes with certain consequences,” Mpofu said.

Midlands State University law lecturer and human rights lawyer, Valentine Mutatu, said it was possible for Chamisa to pursue a fresh application at the ConCourt, although chances of success might be very slim.

“It is very possible for them to make that application to the ConCourt, if there is new and compelling evidence, but without full facts and all the information, it would be difficult for me to make conclusive remarks,” Mutatu said.

He said he would, however, not advise that they take that route given that they will be making the appeal before the same judges who decided the matter in the first place, giving them very little or no room to manoeuvre.

“Without the full facts, I would not advise on that move, although their case at law is correct,” Mutatu said.

The law provides the ConCourt as the last court of appeal and does not provide any avenues for appealing against a ruling in the case of a presidential results appeal.

Another lawyer, Prayers Chitsa, said Mpofu was stepping on a legal minefield, but in essence, nothing could stop Chamisa from approaching the ConCourt.

“It’s a legal minefield in the sense that it has not been done before, but nothing can stop the application if they can prove that there is new evidence that was not available at the time the first application was made, or could have been reasonably made available at the time. I am sure the courts can look at that evidence and could change their initial judgment,” Chitsa said.

Chamisa confirmed that his lawyers were looking at the matter and already taking action, although he preferred not to comment on what had already been done.

Insiders said apart from mounting a fresh ConCourt appeal, Chamisa and his team, with the help of Mpofu, were coming up with a dossier which would be part of a fresh diplomatic onslaught in the region, continent and West to pressure Mnangagwa to the negotiating table.

“The new evidence is being compiled into a dossier which will be used in a two-way process, legal and political. We will be presenting this evidence and findings to Sadc, the AU [African Union] and the international community,” the source in Chamisa’s corner said

  • Share:

Info News

Hire a Construction Accident Attorney Near Me for Fast Claim Resolution

Hiring a construction accident attorney near you ensures faster handling of your claim. Local attorneys are familiar with nearby courts, judges, and legal procedures, which can streamline the process. They also have connections with local experts who can strengthen your case.

rnrn

Speed is critical in construction accident cases because evidence can disappear quickly. A dedicated attorney acts immediately to preserve crucial information and build a strong claim. This proactive approach increases the likelihood of a successful outcome and timely compensation.

rn

Cyber Insurance for Small Business: Coverage Guide

Cyber insurance has moved from a nice-to-have policy to a serious risk management tool for small businesses. Even companies with fewer than 50 employees depend on email, cloud software, online banking, remote access, customer databases, websites, point-of-sale systems, and mobile devices. A single ransomware infection, stolen password, or fraudulent wire request can stop operations and create expensive response costs.

Cyber insurance is designed to help with certain costs after a covered cyber incident. It is not a replacement for good security, but it can support response and recovery when controls fail. The exact coverage depends on the insurer, policy form, endorsements, exclusions, and security requirements.

First-party coverage applies to the business's own losses. This may include breach response, forensic investigation, data restoration, business interruption, ransomware response, crisis communications, legal consultation, and customer notification. If a business cannot operate because systems are locked or cloud access is disrupted, business interruption coverage may help replace covered lost income during the downtime period.

Third-party coverage applies when other people or organizations claim your business caused harm. This may include legal defense, settlements, regulatory investigations, privacy claims, media liability, or contractual claims after a data breach. Businesses that store customer records, health information, financial data, payment information, or confidential client files should pay close attention to this area.

Business email compromise is one of the most important topics to ask about. Many losses now involve fraudulent emails, fake invoices, payroll diversion, vendor impersonation, or wire transfer scams. Some cyber policies cover social engineering or funds transfer fraud only if a special endorsement is added. Others exclude it or provide a lower sublimit. Ask specifically: If an employee is tricked into sending money to a criminal, is that covered?

Ransomware coverage also varies. Some policies may help with negotiation, legal guidance, recovery support, and covered payments where legally allowed. However, insurers may require security controls before offering ransomware coverage. These controls can include multifactor authentication, endpoint detection, backups, patch management, email filtering, employee training, and privileged access restrictions.

Cyber insurance applications have become more detailed. Insurers may ask whether multifactor authentication is used for email, remote access, administrator accounts, and cloud systems. They may ask about backups, encryption, endpoint protection, firewalls, vulnerability scanning, incident response plans, vendor access, and security training. Answer honestly. Inaccurate answers can create problems during a claim.

Not every cyber event is covered. Common exclusions may involve prior known incidents, war or nation-state activity, bodily injury, infrastructure failure, intentional acts, failure to maintain required controls, unencrypted devices, or losses outside policy definitions. Because exclusions can be broad, review the policy with someone who understands cyber risk.

Small businesses should also ask about the insurer's response team. A strong cyber policy is not just a reimbursement document. It should connect the business with breach coaches, forensic firms, ransomware response vendors, public relations support, and legal resources. In an incident, speed matters. Knowing who to call can reduce confusion.

Cyber insurance pricing depends on revenue, industry, data type, employee count, security controls, claims history, remote access, vendor exposure, and coverage limits. Health care, financial services, legal firms, schools, professional services, and e-commerce businesses may face higher scrutiny because they handle sensitive data or payments.

Before buying a policy, map your most important systems. Include email, accounting, online banking, payroll, website hosting, customer records, cloud drives, point-of-sale, remote access, and backup systems. Then compare policy limits against realistic incident costs. A small ransomware event can involve forensics, legal review, overtime, lost revenue, customer notice, and system rebuilds.

Cyber insurance works best when paired with basic security. Use multifactor authentication, strong password management, least privilege access, regular patching, offline or immutable backups, endpoint protection, DNS filtering, email security, vendor reviews, and employee phishing training. Document these controls because insurers may request proof.

For small businesses, cyber insurance is not about fear. It is about resilience. The right policy can help a company recover faster, protect customers, and survive an incident that might otherwise be financially damaging.