Tuesday, November 26

Amai TT Blasts Evidence Chihera Again Uri Nguruve Inetsvina Dhimoni For Digging About My Relationship With Mr Obina

Amai TT is claping back at Evidence Chihera for trying to dig up dirt on her relationship with mr Obina. Mai TT was  on a Facebook live and blasted Evidence calling her Dhimoni and Nguruve inestvina. Mai TT and Evidence has had a love hate relationship in the past but this times there is no holding back as the two women are out to destroy each other. Watch the video below.

Related Story

Inindoona sekuti kana uneinformation yevamwe vanhu varipahigher level than rauri, uchivati vanoba, heee hazvisi zvavo heee vanochengetwa, heee vanorarama fake. 
Heee mota vakatenga nemaridzekuba or kudhonaterwa so on and so forth. Koiwe une information yakakosha kudaro yekuziva kuti vanhu vanoba vachiita mari,  vachirarama fake vachidya madonations wadio wangobawoka wangoitawo kanamari yacho, kana ngoro zvayo???  Unosvika rini uchigara muchikwere chehuku iwe une information yevanhu vese vakabudirira uchiziva mutaktik???? Uchivatsvitnyira apa urimuchikwere chehuku, uchifuga magumbeze anenda uchingot haisi imba yake, haisi mota yake ndine information yese. 
Kokana une information wadiio kutenga muchovha chaio neinformation yakakosha kudaro. 
The day you will stop being bitter and stay out of people s business uchatoona kuti unogonawo kutoroja parinani ukatotengawo kana property irinani nebhasikoro. 
Godo manje haaaaa naMwari unofira muchikwere chehuku ichocho.
Haisi imbayake asi arikungoigaraka. 
Haisimota yake arikungoidriver ka. 
Mari haana arikungozvhira zvaanoda wani. 
Arikubira vanhu haasi mujeri wani. 
Tendeuka iwe ubve muchikwere chehuku kana uchiziva mutaktik itawo kwete kungo disher information isingakubhadhare. 
Minister veinformation and publicity who cant even afford the cheapest headboard in town it's a shame. 
Kwaaaaaaa.

Mai TT Ordered To Pay Mai Maketeni $500K For Defamation
Mai TT has been ordered to pay Memory Muyaka $500K for defamation of Character, Mai Makateni took Mai TT to court after Mai TT accused her of publishing falsehoods that she is a prostitute. This happened between November and April this year after the comedian made several posts on her Facebook page which has over 170,000 followers.

Murata also claimed that Muyaka was a witch and a cultist baying for her blood.
In summons now before the High Court, Muyaka complained the accusations tarnished her image as a business person.

and criminal amai Maketeni sued Mai TT and won the case, See cort ruling below.
An internet row between comedian Felistas Murata, best known as Mai Titi, and her ex-friend Memory Muyaka has spilled into court where the latter is demanding $500,000 defamation damages.
Muyaka, the owner of Khloe’s Home Decor (Private) Limited, has slapped Murata with a lawsuit accusing her of publishing falsehoods that she is a prostitute.
This happened between November and April this year after the comedian made several posts on her Facebook page which has over 170,000 followers.

Murata also claimed that Muyaka was a witch and a cultist baying for her blood.
In summons now before the High Court, Muyaka complained the accusations tarnished her image as a business person.

“Plaintiff claim against the defendant is for an amount of $500,000 in respect of damages for defamation and interest. On several dates between November 17, 2019, and April 3, 2020, published several broadcasts on Facebook and WhatsApp platforms about the plaintiff whom she also calls Mai Khloe or Mai Maketeni,” Muyaka said through her lawyers Mundia and Mudhara Legal Practitioners.

“The said broadcasts stated that the plaintiff was a prostitute, a witch, a gossiper and someone who blackmails her clients.”
The lawyers said these statements were both wrongful and defamatory of Muyaka who is a business person and a married woman who is highly-regarded in her community.
They accused the comedian of having published that Muyaka and three others were part of the Illuminati, a secret society that is believed to be involved in Satanism and that they wanted to kill her.

“This was false and intended by the defendant to impute that plaintiff is an evil person. This statement is wrongful and defamatory of the plaintiff who is a Christian,” the wrote in the summons.

It is also alleged that Murata further published that Muyaka had given charms to her husband so that he does not complain or question her when she commits adultery.

Muyaka said all this was false.

Murata is yet to respond.

  • Share: