Monday, August 03

Trump Delivers More Sanctions To Mnangagwa “I’m Just Starting Watiwadii”

IN AN ominous development for President Emmerson Mnangagwa and his under pressure government, the United States of America (USA) has slapped State Security minister Owen Ncube with sanctions over allegations of gross human rights violations.

This comes after Mnangagwa and Zanu PF staged widely-criticised anti-sanctions marches around the country on Friday, in which they blamed the US and the European Union (EU) for Zimbabwe's deepening economic rot.

The sanctioning of Ncube - said to be one of Mnangagwa's closest confidantes - also comes as the US and the EU are increasingly and publicly becoming more critical of Harare, despite the government's repeated claims of being committed to a truly "new" dispensation and to normalising its relations with the West.

United States Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, in a statement, said: "Today, I publicly designated Owen Ncube for his involvement in a gross violation of human rights in Zimbabwe. State-sanctioned violence in Zimbabwe must end now and those responsible for human rights violations must be held accountable."

The listing of Ncube signals United States frustration over the lack of accountability in the killings of innocent civilians in August last year and January this year, as well as ongoing abductions of opposition activists and unionists by state security agents.

There was no immediate response by Zimbabwe's government to the announcement, which is likely to bring fresh anger from the regime which on Friday declared a public holiday to press for the lifting of the sanctions in poorly-attended marches across the country.

The decision to announce the designation of Ncube on the same day as the anti-sanctions demonstrations will be read as a strong signal from President Donald Trump's administration that the lobby for the lifting of sanctions has no takers in Washington.

On the eve of Friday's demonstrations, United States Senate Foreign Relations Committee chairman Senator Jim Risch (R-Idaho) said Mnangagwa's government was "distorting facts" about the sanctions regime to deflect from its failures.

"Responsibility for the current political and economic crisis in Zimbabwe falls solely on the ruling regime that has governed the country for decades. If Zimbabwe's leaders put as much time, financial resources, and effort into delivering on their long-promised reforms as they have in distorting facts and organising ‘anti-sanctions' campaigns, Zimbabweans would not continue to suffer under the dire economic and humanitarian conditions they face today," Risch said.

In Harare, Bulawayo, Mutare, Gweru and Masvingo – the major cities – many stayed away from the anti-sanctions demonstrations, saying they were a distraction from the president's mishandling of the economy, which is plagued by 18-hour daily power cuts and shortages of foreign exchange, fuel and medicines.

Mnangagwa has so far failed to unify the country since taking over from the late Robert Mugabe, who was ousted in a coup in 2017. Hopes of a swift recovery have faded as the economy struggles to exit its deepest crisis in a decade.

Human rights groups in Zimbabwe say the level of repression after Mnangagwa seized power before claiming a controversial election victory last year has gone up several notches, with over 50 activists having been abducted and tortured by suspected state security agents this year alone.

Soldiers were deployed to suppress a protest against delays in announcing results of Zimbabwe's first election without Mugabe on the ballot in July last year. Mnangagwa unleashed the soldiers again to put down protests over sharp fuel price increases in January and February, in a crackdown that left at least 18 people dead.

The United States says it has credible information that Ncube was involved in the recent abductions and denial of the freedom of assembly to the opposition.

"The State Department has credible information that Owen Ncube was involved in gross violations of human rights in his capacity as Zimbabwe's Minister of State for National Security," a statement said.

"We are deeply troubled by the Zimbabwean government's use of state-sanctioned violence against peaceful protestors, and civil society, as well as against labour leaders and members of the opposition leaders in Zimbabwe. We urge the government to stop the violence, investigate, and hold accountable officials responsible for human rights violations and abuses in Zimbabwe."

The statement added that the United States sanctions "target those who engage in corruption, violate human rights, and undermine democratic institutions or processes."

"State-sanctioned violence creates a culture of impunity for human rights abusers. The United States continues to support the Zimbabwean people in need, especially through humanitarian and health assistance.  We will continue to press the government of Zimbabwe to implement necessary political and economic reforms to provide Zimbabwean citizens the prosperity, security, and well-being they deserve."

The United States and the European Union, which imposed sanctions almost two decades ago over alleged rights abuses, have in recent months issued several statements warning against continued violations.

Mnangagwa's government has made the lifting of sanctions a top priority and has held several meetings with senior officials from the United States and the European Union to lobby for that and Zimbabwe's readmission to the Commonwealth.

Risch warned regional countries against weighing in on the side of Zimbabwe's "kleptocratic" government.

"The ruling party should focus on the needs of the Zimbabwean people instead of their bad governance, corruption, and state capture," he said.

"Regional institutions should also focus their energies on supporting democracy, not kleptocratic regimes," he added in an apparent reference to the Sothern African Development Community (SADC) which has backed Mnangagwa's calls for the lifting of the sanctions.

  • Share:

Info News

Health, Legal & Education Insights

Taking care of your future starts with the right decisions in health and legal planning. Compare top health insurance plans, explore affordable medical coverage options, and learn about mental health services that support your well-being. Many individuals are also investing in online degree programs, professional certifications, and career development courses to increase their earning potential and job security.

rnrn

It’s equally important to protect yourself legally by seeking expert legal advice, understanding personal injury claims, and exploring accident compensation options if needed. Whether you’re looking into student loans, debt consolidation programs, or reliable legal consultation services, making informed choices today can lead to a more secure and successful future.

rn

Cyber Insurance for Small Business: Coverage Guide

Cyber insurance has moved from a nice-to-have policy to a serious risk management tool for small businesses. Even companies with fewer than 50 employees depend on email, cloud software, online banking, remote access, customer databases, websites, point-of-sale systems, and mobile devices. A single ransomware infection, stolen password, or fraudulent wire request can stop operations and create expensive response costs.

Cyber insurance is designed to help with certain costs after a covered cyber incident. It is not a replacement for good security, but it can support response and recovery when controls fail. The exact coverage depends on the insurer, policy form, endorsements, exclusions, and security requirements.

First-party coverage applies to the business's own losses. This may include breach response, forensic investigation, data restoration, business interruption, ransomware response, crisis communications, legal consultation, and customer notification. If a business cannot operate because systems are locked or cloud access is disrupted, business interruption coverage may help replace covered lost income during the downtime period.

Third-party coverage applies when other people or organizations claim your business caused harm. This may include legal defense, settlements, regulatory investigations, privacy claims, media liability, or contractual claims after a data breach. Businesses that store customer records, health information, financial data, payment information, or confidential client files should pay close attention to this area.

Business email compromise is one of the most important topics to ask about. Many losses now involve fraudulent emails, fake invoices, payroll diversion, vendor impersonation, or wire transfer scams. Some cyber policies cover social engineering or funds transfer fraud only if a special endorsement is added. Others exclude it or provide a lower sublimit. Ask specifically: If an employee is tricked into sending money to a criminal, is that covered?

Ransomware coverage also varies. Some policies may help with negotiation, legal guidance, recovery support, and covered payments where legally allowed. However, insurers may require security controls before offering ransomware coverage. These controls can include multifactor authentication, endpoint detection, backups, patch management, email filtering, employee training, and privileged access restrictions.

Cyber insurance applications have become more detailed. Insurers may ask whether multifactor authentication is used for email, remote access, administrator accounts, and cloud systems. They may ask about backups, encryption, endpoint protection, firewalls, vulnerability scanning, incident response plans, vendor access, and security training. Answer honestly. Inaccurate answers can create problems during a claim.

Not every cyber event is covered. Common exclusions may involve prior known incidents, war or nation-state activity, bodily injury, infrastructure failure, intentional acts, failure to maintain required controls, unencrypted devices, or losses outside policy definitions. Because exclusions can be broad, review the policy with someone who understands cyber risk.

Small businesses should also ask about the insurer's response team. A strong cyber policy is not just a reimbursement document. It should connect the business with breach coaches, forensic firms, ransomware response vendors, public relations support, and legal resources. In an incident, speed matters. Knowing who to call can reduce confusion.

Cyber insurance pricing depends on revenue, industry, data type, employee count, security controls, claims history, remote access, vendor exposure, and coverage limits. Health care, financial services, legal firms, schools, professional services, and e-commerce businesses may face higher scrutiny because they handle sensitive data or payments.

Before buying a policy, map your most important systems. Include email, accounting, online banking, payroll, website hosting, customer records, cloud drives, point-of-sale, remote access, and backup systems. Then compare policy limits against realistic incident costs. A small ransomware event can involve forensics, legal review, overtime, lost revenue, customer notice, and system rebuilds.

Cyber insurance works best when paired with basic security. Use multifactor authentication, strong password management, least privilege access, regular patching, offline or immutable backups, endpoint protection, DNS filtering, email security, vendor reviews, and employee phishing training. Document these controls because insurers may request proof.

For small businesses, cyber insurance is not about fear. It is about resilience. The right policy can help a company recover faster, protect customers, and survive an incident that might otherwise be financially damaging.