Hopewell Chin'ono fambirawo nyaya idzi ma investor arege kuuya vaite vega ivo vene hanty nyika ndeyavo nema chinaKu investor muZimbabwe kupedza nguva
Terry William Kelly(pictured) has lost Chewore Lodge, as the Supreme Court has upheld the High Court ruling of invalidating a 25-year lease agreement between Suscaden Investments (Private) Limited and ZimParks
Chiwore is a well-known safari throughout the world, and many of its visitors and clients are from big international source markets.
Suscaden Investments, run by 73-year-old entrepreneur Terry Kelly (pictured), has been operating Chewore Lodge and Campsite for 15 years under two successive leases and a deed of settlement.
The lease, given by the Zimbabwe National Parks and Wildlife Management Authority, was annulled by the High Court on the grounds that it was not signed by the responsible minister.
In a judgment delivered on March 21, 2025, Justice Tawanda Chitapi cited that the lack of the minister’s signature or explicit acceptance of the agreement rendered it invalid.
The long running dispute was between Suscaden against ZimParks, The Ministry of Environment and rival safari operator Big Five Safaris, it centred on whether the lease agreement complied with Section 37 of the Parks and Wildlife Management Act.
The Supreme Court judgment read by Justice Chiweshe declared that Suscaden had failed to provide clear evidence that the former Minister Oppah Muchinguri-Kashiri had approved the lease as required by the law.
The court rejected Suscaden's argument that ZIMPARKS' acceptance of rentals and treatment of the lease as valid for 5 years stopped the respondents from challenging its legality.
Minister Muchinguri was denying ever signing the lease agreement, even though the lease agreement document bore her signature. Suscaden key witness, a former ZimParks official, testified that he had received the signed lease agreement document through routine channels.
The official, under cross-examination, testified that he didn't personally witness the minister signing the document and could not challenge her denial.
The dispute around the safari project has seen Suscade Investments managing director, 73-year-old Kelly, going through torrid times.
Kelly was 2023 controversially arrested and detained in remand prison for days on allegations of stealing motion cameras left as bait for hunting in an area where such activities are forbidden.
Despite attempting to hand over the camera to ZimParks rangers at Chewore Lodge and asking them to investigate the issue, they declined to take action and also refused to accept the cameras and use it as an exhibit.
The rangers also refused to accompany Kelly to the illegal hunting site, saying, "It's Billy's, we can't go there," and the head ranger of the area known as Kanda refused to take the camera.
Kelly then handed the camera to the police in Kanyemba.
After signing his statement, the matter was referred to prosecutors at the Guruve magistrate courts, who declined to prosecute, stating it was not theft.
Several weeks later, Kelly was shocked after he was taken by police in the dead of night and transported in a boat belonging to Big Five Safaris, owned by Rautenbach, to Kanyemba.
The ride by boat ride of approximately 50km through Mapata Gorge, is extremely dangerous and forbidden.
Kelly was collected at Kanyemba by five senior officers who had driven eight hours to take him.
The 73-year-old safari operator was further shocked when the officers immediately changed course and drove through the night to Harare, where he was charged and detained.
This was despite the Guruve Prosecutors declining to prosecute him.
Kelly’s troubles were a result of a camera valued at US$50 that he had handed to the police as evidence of illegal hunting.
He was subsequently acquitted by the magistrates' courts in Harare on the basis that there was no substance to the allegations against him.
Kelly, who invested millions of dollars in Chewore, which served as a high-end tourism hub in the Zambezi valley, will certainly lose all the millions he invested as the eviction order is expected to be executed soon.
The Supreme Court ruling in the landmark case will impact on the protection of investment and property rights in Zimbabwe.
Info News
DUI Lawyer Cost and Legal Process Explained
A DUI arrest creates panic fast.
rnrn
People immediately worry about:
rnrn
rn - Jail time
rn - License suspension
rn - Insurance increases
rn - Employment problems
rn - Court costs
rn
rnrn
That’s why many search for DUI lawyer cost and legal process information immediately after arrest.
rnrn
Why DUI Cases Become Expensive
rnrn
DUI cases often involve:
rnrn
rn - Court fees
rn - Attorney costs
rn - License reinstatement expenses
rn - Insurance premium increases
rn - Mandatory classes
rn
rnrn
The financial impact can last years.
rnrn
What DUI Lawyers Actually Do
rnrn
Experienced attorneys may:
rnrn
rn - Review traffic stop legality
rn - Challenge breathalyzer evidence
rn - Negotiate plea agreements
rn - Represent clients in court
rn - Protect driving privileges
rn
rnrn
Strong legal strategy matters heavily.
rnrn
Factors Affecting DUI Lawyer Costs
rnrn
Pricing depends on:
rnrn
rn - Case complexity
rn - Prior DUI history
rn - Trial requirements
rn - State laws
rn - Attorney experience
rn
rnrn
Serious felony DUI cases often cost much more.
rnrn
Final Takeaway
rnrn
DUI cases involve both legal and financial consequences.
rnrn
Experienced legal guidance may help defendants understand options, reduce penalties, and navigate complex court procedures.
rnrn
FAQ
rnrn
How much does a DUI lawyer cost?
rnrn
Costs vary widely depending on case complexity and attorney experience.
rnrn
Can a DUI charge be dismissed?
rnrn
Some cases may be reduced or dismissed depending on evidence and legal strategy.
rn
Best AI Cybersecurity Platforms for Enterprise Threat Detection
AI is transforming cybersecurity.
rnrn
Modern attacks move too quickly for traditional manual defenses alone.
rnrn
That’s why enterprises are investing aggressively in the best AI cybersecurity platforms for enterprise threat detection.
rnrn
How AI Improves Cybersecurity
rnrn
AI systems can:
rnrn
rn - Detect anomalies faster
rn - Monitor massive data volumes
rn - Identify suspicious behavior
rn - Automate threat responses
rn - Reduce false positives
rn
rnrn
Speed matters during cyberattacks.
rnrn
Why Human Oversight Still Matters
rnrn
AI is powerful.
rnrn
But human cybersecurity expertise remains critical for:
rnrn
rn - Incident investigations
rn - Strategic decisions
rn - Regulatory compliance
rn - Complex threat analysis
rn
rnrn
Automation alone is not enough.
rnrn
Final Takeaway
rnrn
The best AI cybersecurity platforms combine automation, analytics, and human expertise to strengthen enterprise defense strategies.
rn