Philip Chiyangwa in Cosafa storm. The details are contained in an audit report done by Baxters and Co, which was circulated to member associations ahead of the Cosafa annual general assembly (AGM) meeting set for Saturday at the Southern Sun OR Tambo Hotel in Johannesburg, South Africa.
COSAFA president Philip Chiyangwa is in the eye of a storm after it emerged that he and his executive members at the regional football governing body allegedly pocketed over R1,5 million in allowances last year, at a time the association had posted an R2,5 million loss.
The audit shows that the executive members got R1 429 400 in allowances last year, a massive increment from the R857 064 they received in the previous year. It is Chiyangwa, the report shows, who received a huge chunk of the money. The flamboyant businessman was allegedly given R301 150 in allowances, in addition to an R580 000 payment he received as an “honorarium”
An honorarium is a voluntary payment that is given to a person for services for which fees are not legally or traditionally required. Honoraria are typically used to help cover costs for volunteers. Chiyangwa then allegedly claimed another R19 696 from Cosafa in travel costs reimbursements. His deputy Frans Mbidi of Namibia received R156 850 while Cosafa executive member (competitions) Timothy Shongwe of Swaziland got R147 390. The other executive members (six) received just over R100 000. Travel and accommodation alone gobbled R749 055.
Member associations who spoke to NewsDaySport on condition of anonymity said they were not happy with the huge perks that Chiyangwa and his executive awarded themselves, when the organisation is teetering on the brink of bankruptcy.
They complained about the honorarium payment, a sum which is above the prize money given to the team that wins the Cosafa senior men football tournament . Winners of the Cosafa senior men – the flagship competition of the organisation, receive R500 000, while the runners-up get R250 000. “And all that money was paid in a year the organisation posted a record loss. How do you justify paying one person allowances that are above the winning prize money for your main competition? It’s unacceptable. We will want that to be debated at the AGM. There will be fireworks this year and heads will certainly roll,” a president of one of the member associations wrote to NewsDaySport last week.
Another member association also alleged mismanagement of funds by the Cosafa executive. They said that former Cosafa president, Patel Suket, who was deposed by Chiyangwa, left huge cash reserves of more than R13 million, which have since been reduced to R3,8 million.
“We have also been made aware that all private trips to South Africa by the Cosafa president and some members of his family and friends have been covered and paid for by Cosafa and such are tucked in the R749 055 summarised figure of travel and accommodation for the year 2019. We are not sure which rule, policy or resolution is being followed. This is violation of financial prudence and we will request detailed reports and ledger accounts to unlock and lay bare what lay beneath these summarised figures,” another source said.
“Also worrying is a figure of R19 696 which was paid to Chiyangwa as reimbursements. Cosafa has always provided tickets to officials and so under what circumstances was the refund paid to the president? Was this not a case of double-dipping after another organisation like Fifa had provided the travel tickets? How and why has such only happened to one person, the president? Is it a coincidence or an act of fraud?” the source queried.
Some were further infuriated on realising that one of the items on the agenda was a proposal for an annual contribution by member associations to competition funds. “We will totally rebuff such. The executive wants the member associations to pay money so that they can get more perks. If they can avoid paying huge allowances and the so-called honorariums, they will be able to fund competitions easily.”
NewsDaySport yesterday sent questions to Cosafa secretary-general Sue Destombes, and the spokesperson Lynda Greeff, but they had not responded by the time of going to print last night.
The audit report also noted that there were party transactions involving a company called Execusports Proprietary Limited which is “owned by a close family member of a key management”. The company received business from the organisation worth almost R2 million in the last two years, something that has rattled the member associations.
Execusports Proprietary Limited, which is allegedly run by a daughter of one of “a very senior figure” at Cosafa, received R790 201 last year. They were paid R970 917 in the previous year for the services they provided to Cosafa. It is not clear what kind of services the company provides.
Some member associations, perceived to be outspoken, are complaining that Destombes allegedly withheld critical information and also deliberately communicated late about the AGM.
Some claim that they only received the notice and agenda of the AGM and the financial statements on Friday last week, on the deadline day to submit their proposals, submissions and questions for consideration and actioning during the meeting.
They said this was a deliberate ploy to disenfranchise and suffocate their input. Some immediately wrote back to the Cosafa secretariat requesting for “more time and details to enable them to adequately prepare and effectively participate in the AGM”.
Zifa have also made their proposal to make a presentation at the meeting, where they are planning to move a motion to dismiss Chiyangwa. The association last year unsuccessfully made a bid to recall Chiyangwa as the president of the 14-member regional body.
They accuse him of interfering with their administration. “Football in Zimbabwe is being poisoned by someone who should be at the worst not negatively interfering and at most complementing efforts of the FA,” wrote Zifa to Cosafa last week. Chiyangwa, who was removed from the Zifa presidency by Felton Kamambo in 2018, maintains his innocence.
Info News
Best Mesothelioma Law Firm: What to Look for Before Hiring
best mesothelioma law firm, mesothelioma law firm, asbestos law firm, top mesothelioma lawyer, asbestos cancer attorney, mesothelioma legal help
rnrn
Best Mesothelioma Law Firm: What to Look for Before Hiring
rnrn
Choosing the right mesothelioma law firm is an important decision. These cases are highly specialized and very different from ordinary injury claims.
rnrn
A strong mesothelioma law firm should know how to investigate decades-old asbestos exposure, identify products, file lawsuits, handle trust fund claims, and support families through a difficult diagnosis.
rnrn
The best law firm for your case is not simply the one with the biggest advertisement. It is the one with the right experience, resources, communication, and strategy.
rnrn
Why Mesothelioma Cases Need Specialized Lawyers
rnrn
Mesothelioma cases often involve:
rnrn
Exposure from decades ago
rnMultiple companies
rnBankrupt asbestos manufacturers
rnTrust fund claims
rnMilitary exposure
rnComplex medical records
rnProduct identification
rnWork history research
rnState law strategy
rnWrongful death issues
rnrn
A general personal injury lawyer may not have the databases or experience needed.
rnrn
What to Look for in a Mesothelioma Law Firm
rnrn
1. Asbestos Case Experience
rnrn
Ask:
rnrn
How long have you handled mesothelioma cases?
rnHave you handled cases involving my jobsite or military service?
rnDo you file lawsuits and trust fund claims?
rnHave you handled wrongful death claims?
rnDo you have trial experience?
rnrn
2. National Reach
rnrn
Asbestos exposure may have happened in multiple states. A national asbestos firm may evaluate where the case can be filed and which law applies.
rnrn
3. Product Identification Resources
rnrn
The firm should be able to investigate asbestos products used at worksites, ships, factories, plants, and construction sites.
rnrn
4. Trust Fund Knowledge
rnrn
Many asbestos companies created bankruptcy trusts. A strong firm should know which trusts may apply and how to file claims properly.
rnrn
5. Compassionate Communication
rnrn
Families dealing with mesothelioma need clear, respectful communication.
rnrn
Ask:
rnrn
Who will update me?
rnHow often will I hear from the firm?
rnWill I need to travel?
rnCan documents be handled remotely?
rnHow do you protect a sick client’s energy?
rnrn
Questions to Ask Before Hiring
rnrn
Ask:
rnrn
What compensation options may apply?
rnWhat deadline controls my case?
rnWhat evidence do you need?
rnHow do you investigate exposure?
rnWhat companies may be responsible?
rnDo you handle veterans’ asbestos cases?
rnDo you charge upfront fees?
rnWhat percentage do you charge?
rnHow long could the case take?
rnWhat happens if my loved one passes away during the case?
rnrn
Red Flags to Avoid
rnrn
Be careful if a firm:
rnrn
Guarantees a specific amount
rnDoes not explain fees
rnHas little asbestos experience
rnCannot discuss trust fund claims
rnPressures you to sign immediately
rnDoes not provide a written agreement
rnDoes not ask detailed exposure questions
rnTreats the case like a simple accident claim
rnrn
No ethical lawyer can promise exact results.
rnrn
Why Timing Matters
rnrn
Because legal deadlines vary by state, timing is critical. Mesothelioma cases may move faster than other lawsuits because patients can be very ill.
rnrn
A lawyer may seek to preserve testimony early through a deposition.
rnrn
Final Thoughts
rnrn
The best mesothelioma law firm should combine asbestos litigation experience, trust fund knowledge, exposure investigation resources, and compassionate client service.
rnrn
If you or a loved one has mesothelioma, choose a firm that understands both the legal complexity and the human weight of the diagnosis.
rnrn
Strong legal help can make the process clearer during one of the hardest times a family can face.
rn
Small Business Insurance Checklist: Coverage to Compare
Small business insurance is one of those expenses many owners do not think about until a contract, landlord, lender, or unexpected claim forces the conversation. The problem is that buying coverage in a rush can lead to gaps, duplicate policies, or limits that look affordable but do not match the real risk of the business. A better approach is to understand the major coverage types, compare quotes carefully, and ask the right questions before signing.
A good business insurance plan starts with general liability coverage. This is the policy many clients and property managers request first because it can help cover claims involving bodily injury, property damage, and certain advertising-related issues. For example, if a customer slips inside a store, or a contractor accidentally damages a client's property, general liability may help with legal defense costs and covered settlements. The exact protection depends on the policy language, limits, exclusions, and state rules.
Many businesses also need commercial property insurance. This can protect buildings, equipment, inventory, furniture, tools, signage, computers, and other business property against covered events. A home-based business should not assume a homeowners policy automatically protects business equipment or customer-related activity. If you work from home, ask the insurer how business property and business liability are handled.
A business owners policy, often called a BOP, can package general liability and property coverage into one policy. It is usually designed for smaller companies with standard risk profiles. A BOP can be convenient, but it is not always enough. Restaurants, contractors, transportation companies, medical offices, and technology providers may need extra endorsements or separate policies.
Professional liability insurance is important for businesses that give advice, provide technical services, design solutions, manage accounts, or deliver professional work where a mistake could cost the client money. This coverage is also called errors and omissions insurance. Consultants, IT providers, accountants, real estate professionals, marketing agencies, engineers, and financial professionals often review this coverage because general liability may not cover professional mistakes.
Workers compensation is another major area. If a business has employees, state law may require workers compensation coverage. It can help pay covered medical costs and lost wages when an employee is injured on the job. Even if your state rules are limited for very small businesses, clients may still require proof of coverage before allowing your team on site.
Cyber liability insurance has become more important because even small businesses store customer records, accept online payments, use email, and depend on cloud platforms. A cyber policy may help with incident response, legal costs, customer notification, data recovery, business interruption, ransomware response, and regulatory issues. Coverage varies widely, so ask what counts as a covered cyber event and whether social engineering, wire transfer fraud, and business email compromise are included.
Commercial auto insurance is necessary when vehicles are used for business. A personal auto policy may not cover business driving, especially deliveries, transporting equipment, or employee use. If employees use their own cars for company errands, ask about hired and non-owned auto coverage.
