Thursday, July 09

Nelson Chamisa MDC President Changing His Tactics Against ZANU PF

MDC leader Nelson Chamisa says the Church must lead the way in initiating dialogue between him and President Emmerson Mnangagwa so as to rescue long-suffering Zimbabweans who are staring at a bleak future.
However, well-placed sources in government say Mnangagwa is unlikely to be swayed by the Church which is reportedly getting its funding from foreign countries that are deemed hostile to Zimbabwe.

The insiders said the nexus between Chamisa and the Church spooked Mnangagwa from attending the prayer meeting that was organised by the Ecumenical Church Leaders Forum. But with Mnangagwa plodding ahead with his engagements with opposition parties, albeit fringe players, Chamisa said the Zanu PF leader is behaving like an ostrich, burying his head in the sand when the economy is on its knees.

“The only way forward is a comprehensive reform programme upon nation-building and peace-building to facilitate national healing and national engagement and international realignment, in order for us to deal with the crisis there must be genuine dialogue.

“We have shouted our voices hoarse inviting Mnangagwa to a table of national dialogue to resolve these issues because nations are built on a foundation of dialogue, but engagement the ostrich way will not resolve our issues.

“The arrogant mindset will not resolve our issues, the dog-eat-dog will not resolve our crisis, we need a credible dialogue, the churches could be a consideration, or maybe former heads of States but it must be underwritten by the international community.

“This is the only answer to the cries of the people, this is the only credible answer to the rural and urban people who are suffering, we need to have a conducive environment for business, we cannot be focussing on politics all the time, the business cycle should be longer than that of politics,” said Chamisa.

Mnangagwa controversially won last year elections, just squeezing through the 50 plus 1 percent threshold.

Although Chamisa contested the outcome in a petition to the Constitutional Court, his application was thrown out.

However, the economy continues to bleed and immediate relief that was expected to come following the election is yet to arrive.

Instead the United States of America extended its sanctions on Zimbabwe alleging human rights abuses and that the people on the sanctions list are a threat to the world superpower’s global interests.

Since the July 30 contested elections, the situation has gone from bad to worse, prices of basic commodities are going up and government’s response to the economic calamities has been the imposition of more and more taxes such as the ubiquitous two percent transaction tax.

“Zimbabweans are suffering, the country is in a deep crisis the crisis is a crisis of governance, the crisis of confidence the crisis of trust, in short it is a political crisis with ramifications on the social wellbeing of the people, this is all occasioned by a disputed elections, what is surprising is that eight months after the elections there is no solution, in other countries this could have been resolved,” said Chamisa.

Mnangagwa’s plan to push for national dialogue has suffered a series of setbacks as more and more opposition parties disengage from the platform citing a lack of sincerity from the incumbent.

Several high profile politicians including Build Zimbabwe leader Noah Manyika and Daniel Shumba of the United Democratic Alliance (UDA) who attended the inaugural meeting have since distanced themselves from the negotiating table citing a plethora of reasons.

Critically, the parties that have withdrawn their participation claiming that Mnangagwa is not sincere and also are demanding the inclusion of MDC Alliance leader Nelson Chamisa who snubbed the dialogue from day one.

In an interview, Shumba said the nation can decide for itself the character of the parties that are still in the so-called national dialogue.

“Zimbabweans should be able to determine the category of those who are still on the table; however, we wish them well.

“The refusal to provide a legal framework for the negotiations renders the whole platform unconstitutional,” said Shumba.

The former Zanu PF Masvingo Central legislator said on Twitter that the current efforts by Mnangagwa for dialogue are designed to hoodwink the nation into believe that there is seriousness on his part when that is not the case.

“The Constitution of Zimbabwe doesn’t provide for such a process. The absence of a willingness to legitimise the nation dialogue renders it an adventure or circus. The UDA refuses to be blindfolded or used as an extension of Zanu PF. The nation shouldn’t expect any outcomes.

“The National Dialogue fallacy is meant to clothe the fox in sheep’s clothes.

“The UDA won’t sanitise a conspiracy or be part of a betrayal of the people’s expectations.

“We’re not opportunists and won’t be part of a process that fortifies delinquencies at the people’s expense,” said Shumba.

Last week, Manyika also sent a letter to Mnangagwa indicating that he will not take part in the discussions because it was not inclusive.

“No meaningful dialogue can happen without a neutral and credible convener being agreed on to facilitate a broad and inclusive dialogue that will include trade unionists, political parties, activities, civic groups and all stakeholders to ensure that the views and interests of all Zimbabweans are represented.

“It is also my position that any dialogue that does not include the MDC Alliance and other critical stakeholders will not pass the credibility test locally and globally,” said Manyika,

Although Mnangagwa had invited all presidential candidates, the likes of Joice Mujuru who led the People Rainbow Coalition in last year’s elections and a former vice president of Zimbabwe did not pitch up, while Zimbabwe Partnership for Prosperity president Blessing Kasiyamhuru said he did not attend the meeting because he was no longer into politics.

“I am not a politician,” said Kasiyamhuru curtly when the Daily News asked him why he was not attending the national dialogue meetings.

  • Share:

Info News

Best Payroll Software for Multi-State Businesses

Managing payroll across multiple states is far more complicated than most business owners expect.

rnrn

Tax rules differ. Labor laws vary. Compliance deadlines constantly change.

rnrn

That’s why growing companies increasingly search for the best payroll software for multi-state businesses.

rnrn

Manual payroll processes create major risks.

rnrn

What Multi-State Payroll Software Handles

rnrn

Strong systems may automate:

rnrn
    rn
  • Tax withholding calculations
  • rn
  • State filing requirements
  • rn
  • Direct deposits
  • rn
  • Employee onboarding
  • rn
  • Compliance reporting
  • rn
rnrn

Automation reduces expensive errors.

rnrn

Why Payroll Mistakes Become Costly

rnrn

Payroll errors may trigger:

rnrn
    rn
  • Tax penalties
  • rn
  • Employee disputes
  • rn
  • Compliance violations
  • rn
  • Audit issues
  • rn
rnrn

Growing businesses often underestimate these risks.

rnrn

Final Takeaway

rnrn

The best payroll software helps multi-state businesses improve efficiency while reducing compliance headaches.

rnrn

Payroll accuracy directly impacts employee trust and operational stability.

rnrn

FAQ

rnrn

Why is multi-state payroll difficult?

rnrn

Different states have different tax laws, labor rules, and filing requirements.

rnrn

Can payroll software automate tax filings?

rnrn

Many modern platforms automate significant portions of payroll compliance.

rn

Mesothelioma Lawyer Cost: How Attorney Fees Work in Asbestos Cases

mesothelioma lawyer cost, asbestos attorney fees, mesothelioma attorney cost, asbestos lawyer contingency fee, no upfront mesothelioma lawyer

rnrn

Mesothelioma Lawyer Cost: How Attorney Fees Work

rnrn

Many families worry about legal costs after a mesothelioma diagnosis. Treatment, travel, caregiving, and lost income can already create serious financial pressure.

rnrn

The good news is that many mesothelioma lawyers work on a contingency fee.

rnrn

That usually means there is no upfront attorney fee. The lawyer is paid a percentage of compensation if the case succeeds.

rnrn

What Is a Contingency Fee?

rnrn

A contingency fee means the attorney’s payment depends on the outcome.

rnrn

If compensation is recovered through settlement, verdict, or trust fund claim, the lawyer receives an agreed percentage.

rnrn

If there is no recovery, the lawyer may not receive an attorney fee. Case cost rules vary, so read the agreement carefully.

rnrn

What Costs May Apply?

rnrn

Mesothelioma cases may involve case costs such as:

rnrn

Medical record fees
rnCourt filing fees
rnDeposition costs
rnExpert witnesses
rnTravel expenses
rnInvestigation costs
rnDocument retrieval
rnWork history research
rnProduct identification research

rnrn

Ask whether these costs are advanced by the law firm and how they are deducted.

rnrn

Questions to Ask About Fees

rnrn

Before hiring a mesothelioma lawyer, ask:

rnrn

What percentage do you charge?
rnAre costs deducted separately?
rnDo I pay anything upfront?
rnWhat happens if there is no recovery?
rnDo you handle trust fund claims?
rnAre trust claims billed differently?
rnWill I receive a written fee agreement?
rnHow are settlement funds distributed?
rnWho communicates with the family?

rnrn

A reputable lawyer should explain fees clearly.

rnrn

Why Experience Matters More Than Cheap Fees

rnrn

Mesothelioma cases require specialized knowledge.

rnrn

An experienced asbestos lawyer may have:

rnrn

Asbestos product databases
rnJobsite exposure records
rnMilitary exposure knowledge
rnTrust fund filing experience
rnMedical expert relationships
rnTrial experience
rnNational asbestos litigation experience

rnrn

A lower fee does not help if the lawyer cannot identify exposure sources.

rnrn

Do You Pay Before the Case Is Filed?

rnrn

Usually, many asbestos law firms do not require upfront payment from clients. However, every firm’s agreement is different.

rnrn

Read the contract carefully before signing.

rnrn

Are Trust Fund Claims Included?

rnrn

Some firms handle both lawsuits and trust fund claims. Others may focus on one path.

rnrn

Ask whether the firm will evaluate:

rnrn

Lawsuit options
rnBankruptcy trust claims
rnVeterans benefits coordination
rnWrongful death claims
rnState filing options

rnrn

Final Thoughts

rnrn

Mesothelioma lawyer cost is usually handled through a contingency fee, but every agreement should be reviewed carefully.

rnrn

Before hiring an asbestos attorney, understand the fee percentage, case costs, trust claim handling, and what happens if there is no recovery.

rnrn

A clear fee agreement helps protect the family during an already difficult time.

rn