Monday, August 03

Mnangagwa Told No Chamisa No Deal By Europe & America

President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s re-engagement efforts with the United States and European countries has hit a brick wall with the diplomats engaged by his emissaries in the Political Actors’ Dialogue (Polad) insisting that MDC leader Nelson Chamisa should be involved in the negotiations.

Polad is a dialogue series initiated by Mnangagwa and leaders of fringe parties who participated in the 2018 presidential elections. Chamisa, who refused to endorse Mnangagwa’s July 2018 electoral victory, has refused to be part of Polad.

Mnangagwa’s grouping has been trying to engage the international community to end the country’s years of isolation through its sub-committee on international relations and re-engagement led by MDC-T leader Thokozani Khupe.It has, however, emerged that most of the diplomats and organisations engaged by Polad so far asked tough questions about Chamisa not being part of the dialogue process, to which no answer was given.

A report by the Khupe-led committee presented by Kwanele Hlabangana and gleaned by NewsDay Weekender revealed that the team met British ambassador to Zimbabwe Melanie Robinson, US ambassador to Zimbabwe Brian Nichols, European Union ambassador Timo Olkkonen among others, and the issue of Chamisa not being part of the process kept coming up.

“In key issues raised by the diplomatic community in our recent engagements, although they applaud and appreciate the great initiative taken by His Excellency ED Mnangagwa and the political leaders that participated as presidential candidates in the 2018 harmonised elections, that of coming together to establish Polad, they are all of the view that the on-going dialogue process should rather be broad-based, with key stakeholders that include the MDC Alliance, civic society, religious groups, white commercial farmers and business,” the report read in part.

“Both the US and EU ambassadors emphasised their desire to have South Africa play a leading role in the dialogue process with former President Thabo Mbeki as the mediator.” Sources who attended a meeting with the United Nations Development Programme team that was on a fact-finding mission, said the UN team also raised concern over the absence of the MDC in Polad.

Chamisa has refused to be part of Polad, saying it was “Mnangagwa’s choir” insisting on the need for genuine dialogue preferably led by a South African mediator. The opposition leader had warmed up to Mbeki following his December visit where he met the two Zimbabwean political nemesis and promised to come back for more engagements.Mbeki has not returned since then. The Mnangagwa administration has, however, insisted there will be no dialogue outside Polad.

Addressing journalists after yesterday’s Polad meeting at State House, Mnangagwa said the platform had been forced to cancel its engagements due to the coronavirus outbreak that has become a global crisis. Mnangagwa was set to dispatch a re-engagement team to US, Europe and other parts of Africa.Mnangagwa said though he was pleased with the ground covered by the Khupe-led committee, their efforts had been dragged by the coronavirus that started in Wuhan, China and is now spreading across the world.

Several countries, including the US, where the Zimbabwean delegation had targeted have closed their borders in the wake of the scourge that has so far killed 5 111 people with more than 138 941 infected.

“The re-engagement committee, they are doing fantastic work and I wasn’t aware. They have done a lot and they had made plans to travel outside Africa, but of course, because of the coronavirus, they are likely not to proceed until they are cleared,” Mnangagwa said. Khupe confirmed the dilemma, saying they had lined up important meetings in and outside Africa, including the US, but they have been forced to put that on hold because of the deadly virus that has been confirmed as a pandemic by the World Health Organisation.

“It is still on but unfortunately because of COVID-19, our trips had to be rescheduled otherwise we had secured meetings in America, in all these countries in Sadc region and others so that we engage collectively to say we are asking for a second chance to go back to the family of nations,” Khupe said.

On the Lovemore Madhuku-chaired committee on governance and legislative agenda sub-committee, Mnangagwa said the report was well-received, but there were some disagreements with government on other aspects.Madhuku said they will meet Mnangagwa next week as Polad leaders after he has presented the reports to Cabinet.

  • Share:

Info News

Term vs Whole Life Insurance: Compare Costs and Coverage

Life insurance can protect a family from financial hardship if a wage earner, caregiver, or business owner passes away. The challenge is choosing the right type of policy. Two of the most common options are term life insurance and whole life insurance. Both can provide a death benefit, but they work differently, cost differently, and fit different planning goals.

Term life insurance is designed to last for a specific period, such as 10, 20, or 30 years. If the insured person dies during the term and the policy is active, the beneficiary receives the death benefit. If the term ends and the policy is not renewed or converted, coverage ends. Because term life does not usually build cash value, it is often more affordable than permanent life insurance for the same death benefit.

Term life can make sense when the main need is temporary protection. Parents may choose a term that lasts until children are grown, a mortgage is paid down, or college costs are no longer a concern. Business partners may use term life to support a buy-sell agreement during key growth years. A family with a tight budget may choose term insurance because it can provide a larger death benefit for a lower premium.

Whole life insurance is a type of permanent life insurance. It is designed to last for the insured person's lifetime as long as required premiums are paid. Whole life policies can build cash value over time. The cash value may be borrowed against or accessed under certain conditions, but loans and withdrawals can reduce the death benefit and may have tax consequences. Whole life premiums are usually much higher than term life premiums for the same initial death benefit.

Whole life can make sense for people who want lifetime coverage, predictable premiums, estate planning support, or a policy that includes cash value. It may also appeal to people who have already built a strong emergency fund, retirement savings, and basic protection, and who want another long-term planning tool. However, it is not automatically better simply because it lasts longer.

The right choice depends on the purpose of the coverage. If the goal is replacing income while children are young, covering a mortgage, or protecting a spouse during working years, term life may be enough. If the goal is lifetime estate liquidity, legacy planning, or long-term coverage that does not expire, whole life may be worth comparing.

Premiums should be reviewed carefully. A policy is only useful if you can keep it active. Buying an expensive permanent policy and later canceling it can be costly. Before choosing whole life, compare how the same dollars could be used for term coverage, retirement contributions, debt payoff, emergency savings, or other goals. This is not an either-or decision for everyone; some people use term life for large temporary needs and a smaller permanent policy for lifelong needs.

Underwriting is another factor. Insurers may review age, health history, medication, family history, lifestyle, driving record, occupation, hobbies, and sometimes medical exam results. Younger and healthier applicants often qualify for lower premiums, but each company evaluates risk differently. If you have a medical condition, an independent broker may help compare multiple insurers.

When comparing quotes, look beyond the premium. Ask whether the policy is level term or renewable term, whether it can be converted to permanent coverage, how long the premium is guaranteed, whether riders are included, and what happens if payments are missed. For whole life, ask for an in-force illustration, guaranteed values, non-guaranteed assumptions, surrender charges, loan interest, and how dividends are handled if applicable.

Common riders include waiver of premium, accelerated death benefit, child term rider, and guaranteed insurability. Riders can add flexibility, but they can also increase cost. Only add riders that solve a clear need.

Life insurance is not just a product; it is a financial safety plan. Start by estimating how much money your family would need for housing, debt, childcare, education, final expenses, and income replacement. Then compare policy types around that need. A licensed insurance professional or financial planner can help you evaluate options based on your state, budget, tax situation, and family goals.

Best Business Credit Cards for Large Monthly Spending

Business owners spending heavily each month often leave enormous value on the table.

rnrn

Travel rewards. Cashback programs. Expense tracking. Employee card controls.

rnrn

The right credit card strategy can improve cash flow while generating significant financial benefits.

rnrn

That’s why many companies search for the best business credit cards for large monthly spending.

rnrn

But not all premium business cards deliver equal value.

rnrn

What High-Spending Businesses Should Prioritize

rnrn

A flashy rewards offer means nothing if the card creates operational headaches later.

rnrn

Experienced business owners evaluate several important factors.

rnrn

Spending Limits and Flexibility

rnrn

Businesses with large operating expenses often need:

rnrn
    rn
  • High spending limits
  • rn
  • Flexible payment structures
  • rn
  • Multiple employee cards
  • rn
  • Fraud monitoring systems
  • rn
rnrn

Operational flexibility matters heavily.

rnrn

Rewards Structures

rnrn

Some cards favor:

rnrn
    rn
  • Travel spending
  • rn
  • Advertising purchases
  • rn
  • Fuel expenses
  • rn
  • Technology purchases
  • rn
  • Office supply spending
  • rn
rnrn

The best business credit card depends on where the company spends most.

rnrn

Expense Management Tools

rnrn

Modern business cards increasingly integrate with:

rnrn
    rn
  • Accounting software
  • rn
  • Expense reporting systems
  • rn
  • Payroll platforms
  • rn
  • Financial dashboards
  • rn
rnrn

Automation saves time for finance teams.

rnrn

Risks Businesses Must Understand

rnrn

Large spending limits can create dangerous financial habits.

rnrn

Poor management may lead to:

rnrn
    rn
  • High interest costs
  • rn
  • Cash flow pressure
  • rn
  • Debt accumulation
  • rn
  • Credit score damage
  • rn
rnrn

Rewards never justify reckless spending.

rnrn

Why Premium Business Cards Have High CPC Keywords

rnrn

Business credit card customers often generate substantial long-term revenue for financial institutions.

rnrn

Banks compete aggressively for high-spending business clients.

rnrn

That’s why these SEO keywords attract strong advertiser competition.

rnrn

Final Takeaway

rnrn

The best business credit cards for large monthly spending combine strong rewards, operational flexibility, fraud protection, and financial management tools.

rnrn

Smart businesses use credit strategically instead of emotionally.

rnrn

That difference matters long term.

rnrn

FAQ

rnrn

What business credit card rewards are most valuable?

rnrn

It depends on company spending patterns and operational needs.

rnrn

Do business credit cards affect personal credit?

rnrn

Some issuers report activity to personal credit bureaus while others do not.

rnrn

Are premium annual fees worth it?

rnrn

For high-spending businesses, rewards and benefits may outweigh annual costs.

rn