TREASURY failed to account for about US$1,03 billion it paid to Sakunda Holdings, a company owned by President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s close ally and adviser, Kudakwashe Tagwirei, under the fabled Command Agriculture programme from 2017 to date, it has emerged.
Command Agriculture is an agricultural scheme that was introduced in 2016 aimed at ensuring food self-sufficiency through supporting farmers with irrigation and farming inputs.
According to the 2017/18 Command Agriculture payment schedule provided by Treasury to Parliament’s Public Accounts Committee (PAC) yesterday, in 2017, Sakunda was given US$378,73 million and US$235,95 million last year by the Finance ministry under the Command Agriculture scheme.
Under the Presidential scheme, another similar agricultural scheme introduced to work in tandem with Command Agriculture, Sakunda received US$51,2 million in 2018.
The PAC chair and Harare East legislator, Tendai Biti, also revealed during the grilling of Treasury officials that Sakunda received a further US$360 million in January towards Command Agriculture.
When all these figures were added together, the amounts totalled nearly US$1,03 billion paid to Sakunda from 2017 to date for the ambitious agricultural schemes with no payment vouchers to show what goods and services were delivered.
Yesterday, Biti grilled the Treasury officials, led by the Finance ministry chief principal director Zvinechimwe Churu — who were summoned by PAC to explain why it failed to provide the payment vouchers.
“Where are the vouchers to say Sakunda supplied and you were entitled to pay?” Biti asked Churu.
Churu replied: “With respect to vouchers, we will talk to our colleagues in the Ministry of Agriculture … We have taken note of the requirement of the committee and we will look into that. But I think it is important to mention to the committee that the vouchers were not supposed to be given to us directly.”
However, Biti charged that since Treasury paid Sakunda directly, it should have insisted on receiving the payment vouchers as well to get proof that Sakunda delivered on the paid goods and services.
“We facilitated financing. That is what we did as a Ministry of Finance and the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe (RBZ), given the challenges the economy was facing, the liquidity challenges the economy was facing, we facilitated a financing … But, all the same, we will do our best to look for the vouchers,” Churu responded.
Biti then asked what was special about Sakunda to have been paid over US$1 billion, to which Churu denied such amounts were paid to Sakunda saying the payments from 2017 and last year did not add up to that amount.
Biti turned to Finance ministry budgets department director Fidelis Ngorora, who was part of the Treasury officials, to shed light on the matter.
“Ngorora, how much have you paid Sakunda from 2017 to now? Because you have been (making) payments even in 2019. You paid US$360 million to Sakunda in January 2019, so that is over US$1 billion. I put it to you that you have paid US$1 billion,” Biti said.
Ngorora retorted: “Chair, it is correct to say that it is over a US$1 billion over the period. They (Sakunda) supplied inputs over the period.”
“Where are the vouchers?” Biti asked.
“This is an issue which is emerging and, as Mr Churu said, we will be looking for them,” Ngorora said.
Mnangagwa was the architect of the Command Agriculture programme during his tenure as Vice-President.
Meanwhile, during the debate, it was revealed that Treasury made a payment of nearly US$375 million to fertilizer company, Fertilizers, Seed and Grain (FSG), under the Presidential Scheme, which operates under the trading name Superfert Fertilizer.
In May last year, FSG managing director Steve Morland was questioned by the Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Agriculture on how his company got the contract to supply fertilizers and agro-chemicals, a contract worth $69 775 000 under the Presidential Scheme.
This was after legislators suspected that the company had been handpicked without going through the required tender procedures.
During the questioning, Morland revealed that FSG submitted a proposal to supply the Presidential Inputs Scheme with fertiliser to the RBZ after being identified by the central bank.
FSG is a local entity that was registered in 2010 and started as a family business. Later, FSG brought in overseas investors.
Despite the Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Agriculture having raised a red flag over FSG, an additional US$304,41 million was paid to the fertilizer firm under the Presidential Inputs Scheme.
Info News
Medicare Part D Plans: How Prescription Drug Coverage Works
Medicare Part D plans, prescription drug plans, Medicare drug coverage, Part D cost, Medicare prescription coverage, best Medicare Part D plan
rnrn
Medicare Part D Plans: Prescription Drug Coverage Explained
rnrn
Prescription drug costs can be one of the biggest concerns for people on Medicare.
rnrn
Medicare Part D helps pay for prescription medications. It is offered by private companies approved by Medicare.
rnrn
Medicare says Part D helps pay for brand-name and generic drugs, and it is optional coverage available to everyone with Medicare.
rnrn
Who Needs Medicare Part D?
rnrn
You may need Part D if you have Original Medicare and want prescription drug coverage.
rnrn
You may also receive drug coverage through a Medicare Advantage plan that includes Part D.
rnrn
Even if you do not take prescriptions now, Medicare says you should consider drug coverage to avoid a possible late enrollment penalty if you join later without creditable coverage.
rnrn
What Do Part D Plans Cover?
rnrn
Part D plans cover prescription medications, but each plan has its own formulary.
rnrn
A formulary is the list of covered drugs.
rnrn
Plans may organize drugs into tiers such as:
rnrn
Preferred generic
rnGeneric
rnPreferred brand
rnNon-preferred brand
rnSpecialty drugs
rnrn
The tier affects your cost.
rnrn
What to Check Before Choosing a Part D Plan
rnrn
Your Exact Medications
rnrn
List every medication, including:
rnrn
Drug name
rnDosage
rnQuantity
rnFrequency
rnPreferred pharmacy
rnGeneric or brand preference
rnrn
Small differences can change your annual cost.
rnrn
Pharmacy Network
rnrn
Some plans have preferred pharmacies where your cost may be lower.
rnrn
Check:
rnrn
Retail pharmacy pricing
rnPreferred pharmacy pricing
rnMail-order options
rnOut-of-network pharmacy rules
rnrn
Restrictions
rnrn
A plan may require:
rnrn
Prior authorization
rnStep therapy
rnQuantity limits
rnrn
These rules can affect access and cost.
rnrn
2026 Part D Out-of-Pocket Cap
rnrn
For 2026, Medicare says yearly out-of-pocket costs for Part D-covered prescription drugs are capped at $2,100. Once that cap is reached, you do not pay copayments or coinsurance for covered Part D drugs for the rest of the calendar year.
rnrn
This is important for people with expensive medications.
rnrn
Part D Late Enrollment Penalty
rnrn
If you go without Part D or other creditable prescription drug coverage for too long after becoming eligible, you may owe a late enrollment penalty.
rnrn
Medicare says the 2026 late enrollment penalty is calculated using 1% of the national base beneficiary premium, which is $38.99 in 2026, multiplied by the number of full uncovered months.
rnrn
Extra Help for Drug Costs
rnrn
Extra Help is a Medicare program for people with limited income and resources. It helps pay Part D premiums, deductibles, coinsurance, and other costs. Medicare says people receiving Extra Help also do not pay a Part D late enrollment penalty while they have Extra Help.
rnrn
Common Part D Mistakes
rnrn
Avoid:
rnrn
Choosing by premium only
rnNot checking your exact medications
rnIgnoring preferred pharmacy pricing
rnMissing enrollment deadlines
rnAssuming all plans cover all drugs
rnNot reviewing the plan each year
rnIgnoring prior authorization rules
rnFailing to apply for Extra Help if eligible
rnrn
How Often Should You Review Your Part D Plan?
rnrn
Review your Part D plan every year.
rnrn
Plans can change:
rnrn
Premiums
rnDeductibles
rnFormularies
rnDrug tiers
rnPharmacy networks
rnRestrictions
rnCopays
rnrn
Even if your plan worked last year, it may not be the best choice next year.
rnrn
Final Thoughts
rnrn
Medicare Part D can help reduce prescription drug costs, but the right plan depends on your medications and pharmacy.
rnrn
Before enrolling, compare formularies, drug tiers, pharmacy pricing, deductibles, and total annual cost.
rnrn
The best Part D plan is not always the cheapest monthly premium. It is the one that lowers your real prescription costs.
rn
Tax Debt Relief Services in 2026: How to Resolve IRS Issues and Reduce Financial Stress
Introduction: Managing Tax Debt Effectively
rnrn
Tax debt can be overwhelming, but solutions are available. Many individuals search for tax debt relief services to reduce penalties and regain financial control.
rnrn
Keywords like “IRS debt relief” are high CPC due to urgency.
rnrn
rn
What Is Tax Debt Relief?
rnrn
Tax relief services help negotiate with tax authorities to reduce or restructure debt.
rnrn
rn
Available Options
rnrn
rn - Installment agreements
rn - Offer in compromise
rn - Penalty abatement
rn
rnrn
rn
Benefits of Professional Help
rnrn
Experts understand tax laws and negotiation strategies, increasing chances of success.
rnrn
rn
Common Mistakes
rnrn
rn - Ignoring tax notices
rn - Filing late returns
rn
rnrn
rn
Future Trends
rnrn
Digital tax management tools are improving accessibility.
rnrn
rn
FAQ
rnrn
Can tax debt be forgiven?
rnIn some cases, yes, through settlement programs.
rn
