Mary Chiwenga Apomerwa Mhosva Yekuuda Kuuraya Genaral Chiwenga

By Staff Reporter
|
53577
|
December 16, 2019

Marry Chiwenga charged with kudakuuraya munhu. In a charge sheet seen by this publication, the State alleges that Marry entered the Netcare hospital where Chiwenga was admitted and removed the Intra Venous Giving Set, as well as Central Venous Catheterthat, were given to the patient.

Marry Mubaiwa the estranged wife of Vice President Constantino Chiwenga attempted to murder the former Army General on June 2019, the state has alleged. Mubaiwa was alleged intercepted by hospital staff as she tried to steal Chiwenga from the hospital bed.

Read the full charge sheet below:

1. The complainant is the Vice President of Zimbabwe Comrade Constantino Guvheya Dominic Nyikadzino Chiwenga.
2. Accused Marry Mubaiwa is the estranged wife of the complainant.

3. On 22 June 2019, the complainant was airlifted to South Africa for emergency medical attention however upon arrival, the accused forced the complainant to stay at Sheraton Hotel in Pretoria for 24 hours.

4. On 23 June 2019, accused kept on denying complainant access to medical treatment and the security team had to force their way to
5. Upon his admission at the hospital, the complainant has inserted with Intra Venous Giving Set as well as Central Venous Catheter in order to sustain his life. Some weeks later, the complainant was transferred to a private ward where he was under 24 hour monitoring by doctors and his security
personnel.
6. During this time when the complainant was admitted at the hospital, he was helpless and would rely on medical staff and the security personnel whenever he was moving from one point to the other.

7. On 8 July 2019, at about 2000 hours, the accused came to the hospital with the intent to cause seriously harm to the complainant. She ordered the security personnel to excuse her alleging that she wanted privacy with the complainant. The security personnel went outside leaving the accused together with the complainant inside the ward.

g. Whilst alone with the complainant accused unlawfully removed the medical Intra Venous Giving Set as well as Central Venous Catheter which were inserted to the complainant and the complainant started bleeding profusely.

9, The accused forced the complainant off the bed, held him by hand and moved out from the ward before being intercepted by the security personnel at the exit door. The hospital staff was called by the security personnel and they reconnected the Intra Venous Giving Set and the Central Venous Catheter and resuscitated the condition of the complainant.

10. The accused disappeared from the hospital after the hospital staff was alerted by the security personnel.

11. The accused had no right whatsoever to act in the manner she did.

Category:
News
Politics

Info News

Navy Mesothelioma Lawyer: Asbestos Claims for Veterans

Navy mesothelioma lawyer, veterans mesothelioma lawyer, Navy asbestos exposure, asbestos claims for veterans, mesothelioma veterans benefits, shipyard asbestos lawyer

rnrn

Navy Mesothelioma Lawyer: Asbestos Claims for Veterans

rnrn

Many veterans, especially Navy veterans, were exposed to asbestos during military service. Ships, shipyards, engine rooms, boiler rooms, insulation, pipes, gaskets, valves, pumps, and other equipment commonly involved asbestos-containing materials.

rnrn

A Navy mesothelioma lawyer helps veterans and families investigate asbestos exposure and pursue compensation options.

rnrn

These claims may involve lawsuits against asbestos product manufacturers, asbestos trust funds, and possible veterans benefits.

rnrn

Why Navy Veterans Faced Asbestos Exposure

rnrn

Navy ships historically used asbestos because it resisted heat and fire.

rnrn

Asbestos may have been found in:

rnrn

Boiler insulation
rnPipe insulation
rnEngine rooms
rnTurbines
rnPumps
rnValves
rnGaskets
rnElectrical equipment
rnFireproofing materials
rnDeck materials
rnShipyard repair areas

rnrn

Veterans may have inhaled fibers during repair, maintenance, overhaul, or demolition work.

rnrn

Military Exposure and Civilian Companies

rnrn

Veterans usually do not sue the military for asbestos exposure. Instead, claims often focus on private companies that manufactured, supplied, or sold asbestos-containing products used by the military.

rnrn

A mesothelioma lawyer can help identify those companies.

rnrn

Veterans and Mesothelioma

rnrn

Mesothelioma can take decades to develop after asbestos exposure. A veteran exposed in the 1960s, 1970s, or 1980s may not be diagnosed until many years later.

rnrn

ATSDR notes that asbestos-related diseases usually appear many years after first exposure.

rnrn

What Compensation Options May Exist?

rnrn

Veterans may have several possible options:

rnrn

Asbestos lawsuit
rnAsbestos trust fund claims
rnVA disability benefits
rnDependency and indemnity compensation for survivors
rnMedical care benefits
rnWrongful death claims

rnrn

The right path depends on diagnosis, service history, exposure evidence, and family situation.

rnrn

What Evidence Helps a Navy Asbestos Claim?

rnrn

Useful evidence may include:

rnrn

DD-214
rnShip assignments
rnRate or job title
rnService records
rnShip repair records
rnShipyard employment records
rnCoworker statements
rnProduct identification
rnMedical diagnosis
rnPathology reports
rnVA records

rnrn

A lawyer experienced in Navy asbestos cases may already know which ships and equipment were associated with asbestos products.

rnrn

Common Navy Jobs With Exposure Risk

rnrn

Potentially exposed Navy roles may include:

rnrn

Machinist mates
rnBoiler technicians
rnPipefitters
rnElectricians
rnFiremen
rnEngine room workers
rnShipyard workers
rnHull technicians
rnMechanics
rnMaintenance crews
rnInsulators
rnSeabees

rnrn

Exposure may also have occurred during ship repair or overhaul.

rnrn

Can Family Members File Claims?

rnrn

If a veteran died from mesothelioma, surviving family members may be able to file wrongful death claims or trust fund claims, depending on state law and deadlines.

rnrn

Families should gather medical records, death certificate, service records, and work history.

rnrn

Final Thoughts

rnrn

Navy veterans with mesothelioma may have legal and benefit options connected to asbestos exposure.

rnrn

A Navy mesothelioma lawyer can help investigate shipboard exposure, identify asbestos products, file trust claims, and pursue compensation from responsible companies.

rnrn

Veterans served their country. They deserve clear answers when asbestos exposure leads to serious disease.

DUI Defense Lawyer: Common Legal Defenses in Drunk Driving Cases

DUI defense lawyer, DUI defenses, drunk driving defense, DUI attorney, beat DUI charge, DUI case defense, DUI evidence

rnrn

DUI Defense Lawyer: Common Legal Defenses in Drunk Driving Cases

rnrn

A DUI arrest is not the same as a conviction. Prosecutors must prove the case, and the defense has the right to challenge the evidence.

rnrn

A DUI defense lawyer looks for legal, factual, and technical problems in the government’s case.

rnrn

Every DUI case is different. Some defenses focus on the traffic stop. Others focus on field sobriety tests, chemical testing, officer procedure, or whether the person was actually impaired.

rnrn

Defense 1: Illegal Traffic Stop

rnrn

Police usually need a legal reason to stop a driver.

rnrn

Possible stop reasons include:

rnrn

Speeding
rnSwerving
rnRunning a red light
rnExpired tag
rnEquipment violation
rnAccident investigation
rnReasonable suspicion of impaired driving

rnrn

If the stop was not legally justified, evidence gathered after the stop may be challenged.

rnrn

Defense 2: No Probable Cause for Arrest

rnrn

Even if the stop was legal, the officer must have enough evidence to make a DUI arrest.

rnrn

A lawyer may review:

rnrn

Driving behavior
rnOfficer observations
rnSpeech
rnBalance
rnOdor of alcohol
rnField sobriety tests
rnStatements
rnVideo evidence
rnMedical conditions

rnrn

If probable cause was weak, the arrest may be challenged.

rnrn

Defense 3: Field Sobriety Test Problems

rnrn

Field sobriety tests are not always reliable.

rnrn

A person may perform poorly because of:

rnrn

Medical conditions
rnAnxiety
rnFatigue
rnAge
rnInjury
rnPoor footwear
rnUneven ground
rnWeather
rnBad instructions
rnLanguage barriers

rnrn

A DUI lawyer may compare the officer’s report to body camera or dash camera video.

rnrn

Defense 4: Breath Test Issues

rnrn

Breath testing can be challenged if the machine or procedure was flawed.

rnrn

Potential issues include:

rnrn

Improper calibration
rnLack of maintenance
rnOfficer certification problems
rnMouth alcohol
rnVomiting or burping before test
rnMedical conditions
rnImproper observation period
rnRadio frequency interference claims
rnTesting outside required time windows

rnrn

A breath result is only as strong as the procedure behind it.

rnrn

Defense 5: Blood Test Problems

rnrn

Blood tests may be challenged based on:

rnrn

Improper blood draw
rnContamination
rnChain of custody
rnStorage problems
rnLab errors
rnFermentation
rnTesting delays
rnDocumentation gaps
rnQualified person requirements

rnrn

A lawyer may request lab records and review whether the sample was handled properly.

rnrn

Defense 6: Rising Blood Alcohol

rnrn

A rising blood alcohol defense argues that the person’s BAC was lower while driving and rose by the time of testing.

rnrn

This may be relevant when there is a delay between the stop and the chemical test.

rnrn

The defense depends on drinking timeline, food intake, body weight, test timing, and expert analysis.

rnrn

Defense 7: Medical Conditions

rnrn

Some medical conditions can affect DUI evidence.

rnrn

Examples may include:

rnrn

Diabetes
rnAcid reflux
rnNeurological disorders
rnBalance disorders
rnEye conditions
rnInjuries
rnFatigue
rnAnxiety
rnMedication side effects

rnrn

A medical issue does not automatically defeat a DUI charge, but it may explain certain observations.

rnrn

Defense 8: Not Actually Driving

rnrn

Some cases involve people found in parked vehicles.

rnrn

Legal issues may include:

rnrn

Was the person driving?
rnWas the engine on?
rnWhere were the keys?
rnWas the vehicle operable?
rnWas the person sleeping?
rnDid anyone witness driving?

rnrn

State laws vary on what counts as driving or actual physical control.

rnrn

Defense 9: Police Report vs. Video Evidence

rnrn

Police reports sometimes make a case look stronger than video shows.

rnrn

A DUI lawyer may review:

rnrn

Body camera footage
rnDash camera footage
rnBooking video
rnRoadside testing video
rnAudio recordings
rnJail observation video

rnrn

Video can confirm or contradict officer claims.

rnrn

Defense 10: Constitutional Violations

rnrn

A DUI case may involve constitutional issues such as:

rnrn

Unlawful stop
rnUnlawful search
rnImproper questioning
rnViolation of rights
rnImproper detention
rnLack of warrant where required

rnrn

A lawyer may file motions to suppress evidence if legal rights were violated.

rnrn

Final Thoughts

rnrn

A DUI defense lawyer does not rely on one-size-fits-all arguments. The defense depends on the evidence.

rnrn

Traffic stop, arrest procedure, field sobriety testing, chemical testing, video evidence, and constitutional issues all matter.

rnrn

If you are charged with DUI, get the evidence reviewed before deciding what to do next.