Friday, October 16

Chamisa Tactics Miserable & Unproductive Says Political Experts

AS TURMOIL consumes the country's opposition, renowned professor of World Politics at the School of Oriental and African Studies at the University of London, Stephen Chan, has once again warned Nelson Chamisa, pictured, and the MDC Alliance that they risk losing political relevance ahead of the crucial 2023 polls.

Speaking to the Daily News in an exclusive interview last week, Chan — who received an Order of the British Empire (OBE) award for his "services to Africa and higher education" in 2010 — also noted that Chamisa and the MDC Alliance were running out of options.

This comes as MDC interim leader Thokozani Khupe and Chamisa have been involved in an ugly and suicidal hammer and tongs war for control of the country's biggest opposition party, to the utter glee of the ruling Zanu-PF.

Now, and amid the escalating brawling — which began since the MDC's much-loved founding father Morgan Tsvangirai died on Valentine's Day in 2018 — Chan said Chamisa was increasingly losing his grip on opposition politics ahead of the fast-approaching 2023 elections.

"It has been a master class in politics by Zanu-PF, in spotting the opportunity to exploit the division between Khupe and Chamisa.

"But Chamisa has been bewilderingly stubborn in clinging to tactics that simply have not, and now will not work.

"And the problem for Western observers is a simple one, based on the observation that if Chamisa cannot negotiate with other opposition factions, how can he negotiate with Zanu-PF, the South Africans and the IMF (International Monetary Fund)?

"It's a question asked in both Whitehall (British government) and the (United States) State Department," Chan told the Daily News in the exclusive interview.

The veteran politics expert also appeared to suggest that Chamisa's support was on the wane, further intimating that the MDC Alliance leader had disappointed his many supporters who had rooted for him in the historic 2018 presidential poll.

"At this moment he (Chamisa) seems bereft of momentum. I think ED (President Emmerson Mnangagwa) and Zanu-PF must be having very sweet dreams right now.

"Well, is he (Chamisa) still popular? I think a great many Zimbabweans are disillusioned with him and his lack of tactical awareness, inflexibility, and indeed lack of alternative policy planning.

"But, as unappetising as it must seem to him, he must come to an accommodation with Khupe.

"She will now be in the driving seat in any such negotiations, and it will be a case of how closely she wants to be identified with Zanu-PF and how much with a sense of being genuinely oppositional.

"But, to an extent, she does need him. He might not be as popular as he once was, but she is not popular at all," Chan told the Daily News further.

Among some of Chamisa's failings, Chan said, was his failure to tackle Mnangagwa and his government decisively — especially when it came to street protests.

"However, the situation was put to me very precisely, and critically, by one of the ambassadors to Zimbabwe: ‘Chamisa expects the people to oppose and do the work of the opposition. He himself is not leading the opposition as a parliamentary party leader and official leader of the opposition'.

"That comment was made before the recall of his MPs. And it is true. Chamisa has not led the parliamentary opposition in any imaginative way. At every stage he has been simply totally predictable," Chan told the Daily News.

"He imagines himself as decisive and firm. I regret that he seems to have reverted to his style as a student leader, which is great for protests on campus, but ineffectual in a national context.

"He seems to have learned nothing from Sudan, where the people rose up using the most modern means of electronic organisation.

"He also seems to have wasted the opening that ‘Zimbabwean Lives Matter' could have afforded him. He shows no signs of being a young leader of the 21st century," Chan added.

This comes as firebrand MDC Alliance deputy national chairman, Job "Wiwa" Sikhala, has advised Chamisa not to think that popularity will guarantee him to become Zimbabwe's next leader.

Sikhala recently told Chamisa that history was replete with popular politicians who later failed to land the number one job in national politics — including Tsvangirai, who died in February 2018 without having led Zimbabwe.

Addressing mourners at the funeral of MDC Alliance MP Anna Muyambo in Chitungwiza, Sikhala told Chamisa that unpopular leaders often became State presidents because of their grit and decisiveness.

"We have lost several party stalwarts since we began this journey. We cannot all perish before we reach our destination … What I have noticed is that popularity alone is not the way to get State power.

 

"I remember Daniel arap Moi in Kenya when he grabbed power from Jomo Kenyatta and was supposed to be a transitional leader for just six months, but clung to power for 24 years," Sikhala said amid clapping and ululation from the gathered crowd.

"I also remembered that Patrice Lumumba was the most popular leader of the liberation struggle in Africa, but an unpopular Mobutu Sese Seko took charge of Zaire (now DRC) for over 30 years.

"The late (former president) Robert Mugabe was probably the most unpopular leader since the history of mankind and Morgan Tsvangirai was the most popular leader since the advent of politics, yet he died before he took State power," Sikhala further told party supporters and mourners.

He also said despite Chamisa and MDC Alliance commanding huge support in the country, State power remained a mirage for them.

"We have 2,6 million votes, meaning that our president and the party are the most popular brands in the politics of this country, but we are not in power.

"Mnangagwa cannot be voted for by a donkey, yet he is in charge. Khupe is hated by dogs and reptiles, yet she is in power.

"So, power is being controlled by the unpopular, while the popular ones are not in power. So, what is the formula, strategy and plan to translate our popularity into political power?

"If we do not find a strategy to unpack that equation, all the leaders — including President Chamisa and me — are also going to die popular, but without taking over power," the lawyer-cum-politician warned.

"Let us think hard on how we are going to solve that equation. The time has been too long … let us finish this off," Sikhala added.

  • Share:

Info News

Structured Settlement Payout vs Lump Sum: What to Know Before Deciding

Receiving a large legal settlement can completely change someone’s financial future.

rnrn

But many people quickly face another major decision.

rnrn

Should you take structured settlement payouts or accept a lump sum payment?

rnrn

The wrong choice can create serious financial consequences years later.

rnrn

That’s why understanding structured settlement payout vs lump sum options matters so much before signing anything.

rnrn

Insurance companies, financial advisors, and settlement firms all have opinions.

rnrn

But your long-term financial stability should remain the priority.

rnrn

What Is a Structured Settlement?

rnrn

A structured settlement provides payments over time instead of delivering all money immediately.

rnrn

Payments may arrive:

rnrn
    rn
  • Monthly
  • rn
  • Quarterly
  • rn
  • Annually
  • rn
  • Through customized schedules
  • rn
rnrn

Many personal injury and wrongful death settlements use structured payment arrangements.

rnrn

Especially for large cases.

rnrn

What Is a Lump Sum Settlement?

rnrn

A lump sum provides the entire settlement amount upfront.

rnrn

This gives recipients immediate access to all funds.

rnrn

For some people, that flexibility is extremely valuable.

rnrn

But large upfront payments also create financial risks if managed poorly.

rnrn

Advantages of Structured Settlement Payouts

rnrn

Structured settlements offer several important benefits.

rnrn

Long-Term Financial Stability

rnrn

Regular payments may help recipients avoid spending money too quickly.

rnrn

That becomes especially important for:

rnrn
    rn
  • Younger recipients
  • rn
  • Injury victims unable to work
  • rn
  • Families managing long-term medical costs
  • rn
rnrn

Predictable income creates financial consistency.

rnrn

Potential Tax Advantages

rnrn

Some structured settlements provide favorable tax treatment.

rnrn

Tax laws vary, so professional financial advice is important.

rnrn

But tax planning often influences settlement decisions heavily.

rnrn

Protection From Financial Mismanagement

rnrn

Sudden large payments sometimes disappear quickly.

rnrn

Structured settlements reduce the temptation for impulsive spending.

rnrn

For some recipients, that protection matters greatly.

rnrn

Advantages of Lump Sum Settlements

rnrn

Lump sum payments also provide major advantages.

rnrn

Immediate Financial Flexibility

rnrn

Recipients can:

rnrn
    rn
  • Pay off debt
  • rn
  • Invest money
  • rn
  • Purchase property
  • rn
  • Cover major medical expenses
  • rn
  • Launch businesses
  • rn
rnrn

Immediate access creates opportunities structured payments may limit.

rnrn

Inflation Protection

rnrn

Fixed structured payments may lose value over time because of inflation.

rnrn

A lump sum allows recipients to invest funds in ways that potentially outpace inflation.

rnrn

Greater Investment Control

rnrn

Some recipients prefer managing investments independently.

rnrn

Skilled financial planning can potentially grow wealth substantially.

rnrn

However, investment losses also become possible.

rnrn

Risks of Lump Sum Payments

rnrn

Not everyone handles large settlements well.

rnrn

That’s the uncomfortable truth.

rnrn

Some recipients:

rnrn
    rn
  • Overspend quickly
  • rn
  • Make risky investments
  • rn
  • Fall victim to scams
  • rn
  • Face pressure from friends or family
  • rn
rnrn

Financial discipline becomes critical.

rnrn

Risks of Structured Settlements

rnrn

Structured payments also carry disadvantages.

rnrn

These may include:

rnrn
    rn
  • Limited financial flexibility
  • rn
  • Reduced access during emergencies
  • rn
  • Inflation concerns
  • rn
  • Difficulty changing payment terms later
  • rn
rnrn

Some people eventually sell future payments at discounted rates.

rnrn

That can become expensive long term.

rnrn

Who Often Benefits Most From Structured Settlements?

rnrn

Structured payouts may work well for:

rnrn
    rn
  • Catastrophic injury victims
  • rn
  • Minors receiving settlements
  • rn
  • Individuals needing long-term care
  • rn
  • Families wanting predictable income
  • rn
rnrn

Stability matters heavily in these situations.

rnrn

Who Often Prefers Lump Sums?

rnrn

Lump sums may appeal more to:

rnrn
    rn
  • Experienced investors
  • rn
  • Business owners
  • rn
  • Individuals with major debt
  • rn
  • People needing immediate financial flexibility
  • rn
rnrn

Each situation differs.

rnrn

There is no universal answer.

rnrn

Why Financial and Legal Guidance Matters

rnrn

Settlement decisions can affect decades of financial security.

rnrn

Experienced professionals may help evaluate:

rnrn
    rn
  • Tax implications
  • rn
  • Investment risks
  • rn
  • Medical cost projections
  • rn
  • Estate planning
  • rn
  • Long-term financial needs
  • rn
rnrn

Rushed decisions often create regret later.

rnrn

Why Structured Settlement Keywords Have High CPC

rnrn

Settlement funding companies, financial advisors, insurance firms, and legal services aggressively compete for qualified leads.

rnrn

Large financial transactions create extremely valuable customers.

rnrn

That’s why structured settlement SEO keywords often attract premium advertising rates.

rnrn

Final Takeaway

rnrn

The structured settlement payout vs lump sum decision depends heavily on financial discipline, long-term goals, medical needs, and personal circumstances.

rnrn

Structured payments offer stability and predictability. Lump sums provide flexibility and investment opportunities.

rnrn

Neither option is automatically better.

rnrn

The smartest recipients carefully evaluate long-term consequences before making irreversible decisions.

rnrn

One financial choice today can shape financial security for decades.

rnrn

FAQ

rnrn

Is a structured settlement better than a lump sum?

rnrn

It depends on financial goals, spending habits, and long-term income needs.

rnrn

Are structured settlements taxable?

rnrn

Some structured settlements receive favorable tax treatment, though professional advice is important.

rnrn

Can structured settlements be changed later?

rnrn

Changes can be difficult and often require selling future payments at discounts.

rnrn

Why do some people choose lump sum settlements?

rnrn

Lump sums provide immediate flexibility for investing, paying debt, or major purchases.

rnrn

What are the risks of taking a lump sum?

rnrn

Poor financial management, risky investments, and overspending may create long-term financial problems.

rn

Technology, SaaS & Online Business Growth

In today’s digital economy, businesses are scaling rapidly with powerful SaaS platforms, cloud-based software solutions, and AI-driven tools. Entrepreneurs are investing in website hosting services, email marketing software, and CRM systems to boost customer engagement and revenue. Choosing the right business automation tools can streamline operations and increase profitability.

rnrn

From e-commerce platforms to digital marketing services, companies are finding new ways to expand online. Secure your business with advanced cybersecurity software, optimize performance with data analytics tools, and explore high-converting sales funnels to stay ahead in a competitive market.

rn