Apostolic Faith Mission (AFM) pastor in an ongoing dispute over the use of church premises, r
By Staff Reporter
|
634
|
February 02, 2026
HARARE - High Court judge Justice Maxwell Takuva has dismissed a preliminary objection raised by a former Apostolic Faith Mission (AFM) pastor in an ongoing dispute over the use of church premises, ruling that the application before the court was properly authorised.
The matter involved the Apostolic Faith Mission in Zimbabwe (AFMZ) as the applicant, and the Apostolic Faith Mission of Zimbabwe together with former pastor Willard Kurida as respondents.
AFMZ, represented by Zvimba Law Chambers, had approached the court seeking a permanent interdict to bar the respondents and their followers from accessing, using, or conducting services and gatherings at its premises.
The church argued that the respondents were unlawfully occupying its property and conducting religious activities without authority.Who is supposed to be the president after Madzivire? I think Chiyangwa was supposed to be president since he was madzivire's deputy, then madawo was supposed to be Chiyangwas deputy for the next 15years or so Chiyangwa achibuda Pau president osiirawo madawo zvichienda zvakaderowas among the pastors who joined the breakaway group.
AFMZ alleged that Kurida continued to conduct church services on AFMZ premises on behalf of the rival institution, despite having no lawful right to do so.
Before the merits of the interdict application could be heard, Kurida’s legal practitioner raised a point in limine, arguing that the application was invalid because the founding affidavit was deposed to by a person who allegedly lacked proper authority.
The respondent, represented by Moyo, Chikono and Gomero, argued that the resolution authorising the litigation was too general, failed to identify the respondents, and did not specify the cause of action.
The applicant opposed the objection, maintaining that the resolution was valid, emanated from the institution, and properly authorised its representative to institute proceedings. AFMZ relied on Supreme Court authority to support its position.
In his analysis, Justice Takuva held that the resolution clearly identified the cause of action as unlawful occupation of the church’s property and that it was not necessary to name the respondents individually.
He found that the cases relied upon by the second respondent were distinguishable from the facts before the court.
“The resolution in casu shows the cause of action… as the unlawful occupation by identified personnel,” Justice Takuva ruled.
“The resolution is not general in that it speaks to illegal occupants of Applicant ’s property. One need not identify by name the parties involved. As regards the cases cited by the second Respondent, I take the view that they are distinguishable from the facts of this matter.”
The court dismissed the point in limine with costs, ordering the second respondent to pay the costs of suit.
The ruling clears the way for the High Court to proceed to hear the substantive application for an interdict against the respondents.as a pastor until his dismissal in 2018.
The dispute arises from a leadership wrangle that rocked the church between 2017 and 2019, which was eventually resolved by the Supreme Court. In judgment SC 67/21, the Supreme Court ruled that Amon Dubie Madawo was the legitimately elected leader of AFMZ.
Following that ruling, a faction led by Cossam Chiangwa broke away from AFMZ and formed a separate church using a similar nameCossam Chiangwa who leads the breakaway faction of the AFM church seen here in Liverpool during a church service (Picture via Facebook – AFMIM Vessels of Honour Liverpool page)
AFMZ told the court that it is a long-established Pentecostal church, founded in Zimbabwe around 1916, and operates as a legal entity with the capacity to own property and litigate in its own name.
Uncontested Divorce Lawyer: A Faster Way To End A Marriage
An uncontested divorce lawyer helps couples who agree on major issues end their marriage with less conflict and lower cost.
rnrn
An uncontested divorce may be possible when both spouses agree on property division, debt division, child custody, child support, and spousal support.
rnrn
This type of divorce is usually faster than a contested divorce because there are fewer disputes for the court to decide.
rnrn
A lawyer can prepare documents, make sure the agreement is complete, and help avoid mistakes that cause delays.
rnrn
Even when spouses agree, legal review is important. A poorly written agreement can create future problems.
rnrn
Uncontested divorce may not be right if there is domestic violence, hidden assets, major power imbalance, or serious custody conflict.
rnrn
For couples who can cooperate, an uncontested divorce may save time, money, and emotional stress.
rn
Cloud Backup Solutions for Small Business: Protect Your Data Before Disaster Strikes
Every small business depends on data. Customer records, invoices, payroll files, email, contracts, website files, and accounting records are all critical. If that data is lost because of ransomware, hardware failure, accidental deletion, fire, theft, or natural disaster, the business may face serious downtime.
rnrn
Cloud backup solutions help protect important files by copying data to secure off-site storage. Unlike a simple external hard drive, cloud backup can provide automated protection and recovery options from almost anywhere.
rnrn
A good backup strategy should include more than one copy of important data. Many businesses follow the 3-2-1 backup rule: keep three copies of data, use two different storage types, and store one copy off-site. Cloud backup helps with the off-site part of this strategy.
rnrn
Automation is one of the biggest benefits. Employees may forget to manually copy files, but automated backup software can run on a schedule. This reduces the risk of missing important data.
rnrn
Ransomware protection is another key feature. Some backup services offer version history, which allows a business to restore files from a point before the attack. This can be extremely important if files are encrypted or corrupted.
rnrn
When comparing cloud backup providers, look at storage limits, backup frequency, recovery speed, encryption, compliance features, customer support, and pricing. Some providers charge by storage amount, while others charge per device or user.
rnrn
Recovery testing is just as important as backup. A backup is only useful if you can restore it when needed. Small businesses should periodically test file recovery and document the process.
rnrn
Business continuity should also be considered. If a server fails, how quickly can operations continue? Some advanced backup solutions offer disaster recovery features that allow systems to be restored to virtual environments.
rnrn
Security matters because backup data may include sensitive customer and financial information. Look for services that offer encryption during transfer and storage, multi-factor authentication, access controls, and activity logs.
rnrn
Cloud backup is not only for large companies. Small businesses are often more vulnerable because they may not have dedicated IT staff. A reliable backup solution can reduce risk, protect customer trust, and help the business recover faster after a problem.
rnrn
The best time to create a backup plan is before something goes wrong.
