AFM

Apostolic Faith Mission (AFM) pastor in an ongoing dispute over the use of church premises, r

By Staff Reporter
|
548
|
February 02, 2026

HARARE - High Court judge Justice Maxwell Takuva has dismissed a preliminary objection raised by a former Apostolic Faith Mission (AFM) pastor in an ongoing dispute over the use of church premises, ruling that the application before the court was properly authorised.

The matter involved the Apostolic Faith Mission in Zimbabwe (AFMZ) as the applicant, and the Apostolic Faith Mission of Zimbabwe together with former pastor Willard Kurida as respondents.

AFMZ, represented by Zvimba Law Chambers, had approached the court seeking a permanent interdict to bar the respondents and their followers from accessing, using, or conducting services and gatherings at its premises.

The church argued that the respondents were unlawfully occupying its property and conducting religious activities without authority.Who is supposed to be the president after Madzivire? I think Chiyangwa was supposed to be president since he was madzivire's deputy, then madawo was supposed to be Chiyangwas deputy for the next 15years or so Chiyangwa achibuda Pau president osiirawo madawo zvichienda zvakaderowas among the pastors who joined the breakaway group.

AFMZ alleged that Kurida continued to conduct church services on AFMZ premises on behalf of the rival institution, despite having no lawful right to do so.

Before the merits of the interdict application could be heard, Kurida’s legal practitioner raised a point in limine, arguing that the application was invalid because the founding affidavit was deposed to by a person who allegedly lacked proper authority.

The respondent, represented by Moyo, Chikono and Gomero, argued that the resolution authorising the litigation was too general, failed to identify the respondents, and did not specify the cause of action.

The applicant opposed the objection, maintaining that the resolution was valid, emanated from the institution, and properly authorised its representative to institute proceedings. AFMZ relied on Supreme Court authority to support its position.

In his analysis, Justice Takuva held that the resolution clearly identified the cause of action as unlawful occupation of the church’s property and that it was not necessary to name the respondents individually.

He found that the cases relied upon by the second respondent were distinguishable from the facts before the court.

“The resolution in casu shows the cause of action… as the unlawful occupation by identified personnel,” Justice Takuva ruled.

“The resolution is not general in that it speaks to illegal occupants of Applicant ’s property. One need not identify by name the parties involved. As regards the cases cited by the second Respondent, I take the view that they are distinguishable from the facts of this matter.”

The court dismissed the point in limine with costs, ordering the second respondent to pay the costs of suit.

The ruling clears the way for the High Court to proceed to hear the substantive application for an interdict against the respondents.as a pastor until his dismissal in 2018.

The dispute arises from a leadership wrangle that rocked the church between 2017 and 2019, which was eventually resolved by the Supreme Court. In judgment SC 67/21, the Supreme Court ruled that Amon Dubie Madawo was the legitimately elected leader of AFMZ.

Following that ruling, a faction led by Cossam Chiangwa broke away from AFMZ and formed a separate church using a similar name

Cossam Chiangwa who leads the breakaway faction of the AFM church seen here in Liverpool during a church service (Picture via Facebook – AFMIM Vessels of Honour Liverpool page)

AFMZ told the court that it is a long-established Pentecostal church, founded in Zimbabwe around 1916, and operates as a legal entity with the capacity to own property and litigate in its own name.

Category:
News
General

Info News

Personal Injury Lawyer Questions Before Hiring

After an accident, choosing a personal injury lawyer can feel overwhelming. You may be dealing with medical appointments, missed work, insurance calls, vehicle repairs, pain, and uncertainty about what happens next. A lawyer can help with claim strategy, evidence, deadlines, negotiations, and litigation, but not every attorney is the right fit for every case.

The first question is experience. Ask whether the attorney has handled cases similar to yours. A car accident case is different from a trucking accident, medical malpractice claim, workplace third-party claim, defective product case, or premises liability case. Similar case experience can help the lawyer understand evidence, expert witnesses, insurance tactics, and likely challenges.

Next, ask who will actually handle the file. In some firms, the lawyer you meet may not be the person managing daily communication. Paralegals, case managers, associates, and investigators may all be involved. That is normal, but you should know who your main contact will be and how often you will receive updates.

Fees are important. Many personal injury lawyers work on a contingency fee, meaning they are paid a percentage of the recovery if money is obtained. Ask what percentage applies, whether it changes if a lawsuit is filed, and how case expenses are handled. Expenses may include filing fees, medical records, depositions, expert witnesses, investigation, and trial exhibits. Ask whether expenses are deducted before or after the attorney fee and whether you owe expenses if there is no recovery.

Ask about the strength and weakness of your case. A trustworthy lawyer should not promise a guaranteed result. They should discuss liability, damages, insurance limits, prior injuries, medical documentation, comparative fault, witness issues, and possible defenses. If a lawyer only tells you what you want to hear, be cautious.

Evidence can determine the outcome of a claim. Ask what evidence should be gathered immediately. This may include accident reports, photographs, video footage, witness statements, medical records, employer wage records, vehicle data, inspection records, maintenance records, or property incident reports. Some evidence can disappear quickly, so early action matters.

Medical treatment is another key topic. Personal injury claims often depend on documented injuries, treatment consistency, diagnosis, prognosis, and how the injury affects daily life. Follow medical advice and keep records of appointments, prescriptions, therapy, restrictions, and out-of-pocket expenses. Do not exaggerate, but do not minimize symptoms either.

Ask how the attorney evaluates settlement offers. A settlement should consider medical bills, future care, lost income, reduced earning capacity, pain and suffering, property damage, permanent impairment, and other legally recognized damages. The exact rules vary by state and case type. The attorney should explain the factors, not just give a quick number.

Timeline is another area to discuss. Some claims settle in months, while others take much longer, especially if injuries are serious or liability is disputed. A lawyer may recommend waiting until you reach maximum medical improvement before settlement so future medical needs are clearer. Settling too early can be risky because you usually release claims permanently.

Communication expectations should be clear. Ask how quickly calls or emails are returned, whether the firm uses a client portal, and what updates you will receive. A good lawyer-client relationship requires trust, responsiveness, and organized documentation.

You should also ask whether the lawyer is prepared to file a lawsuit if necessary. Many cases settle, but the willingness and ability to litigate can affect negotiation leverage. Ask about trial experience, recent results, and how the firm prepares cases.

This article is general information, not legal advice. Personal injury laws, deadlines, damages, and fault rules vary by state. Speak with a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction to understand your rights. The best lawyer for your case is someone with relevant experience, clear communication, transparent fees, and a realistic plan for proving your claim.

Mortgage Refinancing Strategies for Homeowners Looking to Reduce Monthly Payments

Mortgage refinancing has become a popular financial strategy for homeowners seeking lower monthly payments and long-term savings. Refinancing involves replacing an existing mortgage with a new loan that offers improved terms, lower interest rates, or adjusted repayment schedules. Homeowners often refinance to reduce borrowing costs, access home equity, or switch from adjustable-rate loans to fixed-rate mortgages.

rnrn

Interest rates play a major role in refinancing decisions. Even a small reduction in mortgage interest can save homeowners thousands of dollars over the life of a loan. Many borrowers also use refinancing to consolidate debt or fund home renovations that increase property value. Financial institutions evaluate factors such as credit scores, income stability, and property equity when determining refinancing eligibility.

rnrn

One of the most important aspects of refinancing is comparing lenders carefully. Homeowners should review closing costs, loan terms, repayment periods, and hidden fees before signing new agreements. Online mortgage calculators and financial planning tools can help estimate monthly savings and overall loan affordability.

rnrn

Refinancing may not be the right option for everyone, especially if closing costs outweigh long-term savings. Financial advisors encourage borrowers to calculate break-even points and evaluate long-term financial goals before refinancing a mortgage. Responsible borrowing and careful planning can help homeowners improve financial stability while reducing debt burdens.