Apostolic Faith Mission (AFM) pastor in an ongoing dispute over the use of church premises, r
By Staff Reporter
|
439
|
February 02, 2026
HARARE - High Court judge Justice Maxwell Takuva has dismissed a preliminary objection raised by a former Apostolic Faith Mission (AFM) pastor in an ongoing dispute over the use of church premises, ruling that the application before the court was properly authorised.
The matter involved the Apostolic Faith Mission in Zimbabwe (AFMZ) as the applicant, and the Apostolic Faith Mission of Zimbabwe together with former pastor Willard Kurida as respondents.
AFMZ, represented by Zvimba Law Chambers, had approached the court seeking a permanent interdict to bar the respondents and their followers from accessing, using, or conducting services and gatherings at its premises.
The church argued that the respondents were unlawfully occupying its property and conducting religious activities without authority.Who is supposed to be the president after Madzivire? I think Chiyangwa was supposed to be president since he was madzivire's deputy, then madawo was supposed to be Chiyangwas deputy for the next 15years or so Chiyangwa achibuda Pau president osiirawo madawo zvichienda zvakaderowas among the pastors who joined the breakaway group.
AFMZ alleged that Kurida continued to conduct church services on AFMZ premises on behalf of the rival institution, despite having no lawful right to do so.
Before the merits of the interdict application could be heard, Kurida’s legal practitioner raised a point in limine, arguing that the application was invalid because the founding affidavit was deposed to by a person who allegedly lacked proper authority.
The respondent, represented by Moyo, Chikono and Gomero, argued that the resolution authorising the litigation was too general, failed to identify the respondents, and did not specify the cause of action.
The applicant opposed the objection, maintaining that the resolution was valid, emanated from the institution, and properly authorised its representative to institute proceedings. AFMZ relied on Supreme Court authority to support its position.
In his analysis, Justice Takuva held that the resolution clearly identified the cause of action as unlawful occupation of the church’s property and that it was not necessary to name the respondents individually.
He found that the cases relied upon by the second respondent were distinguishable from the facts before the court.
“The resolution in casu shows the cause of action… as the unlawful occupation by identified personnel,” Justice Takuva ruled.
“The resolution is not general in that it speaks to illegal occupants of Applicant ’s property. One need not identify by name the parties involved. As regards the cases cited by the second Respondent, I take the view that they are distinguishable from the facts of this matter.”
The court dismissed the point in limine with costs, ordering the second respondent to pay the costs of suit.
The ruling clears the way for the High Court to proceed to hear the substantive application for an interdict against the respondents.as a pastor until his dismissal in 2018.
The dispute arises from a leadership wrangle that rocked the church between 2017 and 2019, which was eventually resolved by the Supreme Court. In judgment SC 67/21, the Supreme Court ruled that Amon Dubie Madawo was the legitimately elected leader of AFMZ.
Following that ruling, a faction led by Cossam Chiangwa broke away from AFMZ and formed a separate church using a similar nameCossam Chiangwa who leads the breakaway faction of the AFM church seen here in Liverpool during a church service (Picture via Facebook – AFMIM Vessels of Honour Liverpool page)
AFMZ told the court that it is a long-established Pentecostal church, founded in Zimbabwe around 1916, and operates as a legal entity with the capacity to own property and litigate in its own name.
Renewable Energy Is Reshaping the Future of Global Power
Renewable energy has become one of the fastest-growing industries in the world as countries seek cleaner and more sustainable alternatives to fossil fuels. Solar power, wind energy, hydroelectric systems, and battery storage technologies are helping reduce environmental pollution while creating new economic opportunities.
rnrn
Governments and private companies are investing billions of dollars into renewable infrastructure projects to address climate change and rising energy demands. Many countries are setting ambitious goals to reduce carbon emissions and transition toward greener energy systems over the next few decades.
rnrn
Solar energy is especially growing rapidly in Africa due to abundant sunlight and increasing demand for electricity in rural communities. Countries such as Kenya, South Africa, Ghana, and Zimbabwe are expanding solar projects to improve access to affordable power while reducing dependence on expensive fuel imports.
rnrn
Electric vehicles are also contributing to the renewable energy movement. Major automotive manufacturers are increasing production of electric cars and investing in battery innovation and charging infrastructure. Consumers are becoming more interested in energy-efficient transportation due to rising fuel prices and environmental concerns.
rnrn
Renewable energy industries are creating thousands of new jobs worldwide in engineering, construction, manufacturing, and technology sectors. Experts believe green energy investments will continue driving economic growth while supporting environmental sustainability goals.
rnrn
Although challenges remain, including energy storage limitations and infrastructure costs, analysts predict renewable energy will play a dominant role in the future global economy. Countries that invest early in clean energy technology are expected to benefit from long-term economic and environmental advantages.
rn
Mesothelioma Compensation: How Victims May Recover Money
A mesothelioma diagnosis can bring emotional and financial hardship. Treatment can be expensive, and many patients are unable to work. Mesothelioma compensation may help victims and families cover important costs.
rnrn
Compensation may come from asbestos trust funds, settlements, lawsuits, veterans benefits, or wrongful death claims. The best option depends on where exposure happened and which companies were responsible.
rnrn
Asbestos trust funds were created by companies that filed bankruptcy but still had responsibility for asbestos-related harm. Many victims may qualify if their exposure can be documented.
rnrn
A lawsuit may be filed against companies that manufactured, supplied, or used asbestos products. Some cases settle before trial, while others may go to court.
rnrn
Compensation may cover medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering, travel costs, caregiving expenses, and loss of financial support.
rnrn
A mesothelioma lawyer can investigate exposure history, identify responsible companies, file claims, and negotiate settlements.
rnrn
Because deadlines apply, victims should not wait too long to explore legal options.
