Apostolic Faith Mission (AFM) pastor in an ongoing dispute over the use of church premises, r
By Staff Reporter
|
510
|
February 02, 2026
HARARE - High Court judge Justice Maxwell Takuva has dismissed a preliminary objection raised by a former Apostolic Faith Mission (AFM) pastor in an ongoing dispute over the use of church premises, ruling that the application before the court was properly authorised.
The matter involved the Apostolic Faith Mission in Zimbabwe (AFMZ) as the applicant, and the Apostolic Faith Mission of Zimbabwe together with former pastor Willard Kurida as respondents.
AFMZ, represented by Zvimba Law Chambers, had approached the court seeking a permanent interdict to bar the respondents and their followers from accessing, using, or conducting services and gatherings at its premises.
The church argued that the respondents were unlawfully occupying its property and conducting religious activities without authority.Who is supposed to be the president after Madzivire? I think Chiyangwa was supposed to be president since he was madzivire's deputy, then madawo was supposed to be Chiyangwas deputy for the next 15years or so Chiyangwa achibuda Pau president osiirawo madawo zvichienda zvakaderowas among the pastors who joined the breakaway group.
AFMZ alleged that Kurida continued to conduct church services on AFMZ premises on behalf of the rival institution, despite having no lawful right to do so.
Before the merits of the interdict application could be heard, Kurida’s legal practitioner raised a point in limine, arguing that the application was invalid because the founding affidavit was deposed to by a person who allegedly lacked proper authority.
The respondent, represented by Moyo, Chikono and Gomero, argued that the resolution authorising the litigation was too general, failed to identify the respondents, and did not specify the cause of action.
The applicant opposed the objection, maintaining that the resolution was valid, emanated from the institution, and properly authorised its representative to institute proceedings. AFMZ relied on Supreme Court authority to support its position.
In his analysis, Justice Takuva held that the resolution clearly identified the cause of action as unlawful occupation of the church’s property and that it was not necessary to name the respondents individually.
He found that the cases relied upon by the second respondent were distinguishable from the facts before the court.
“The resolution in casu shows the cause of action… as the unlawful occupation by identified personnel,” Justice Takuva ruled.
“The resolution is not general in that it speaks to illegal occupants of Applicant ’s property. One need not identify by name the parties involved. As regards the cases cited by the second Respondent, I take the view that they are distinguishable from the facts of this matter.”
The court dismissed the point in limine with costs, ordering the second respondent to pay the costs of suit.
The ruling clears the way for the High Court to proceed to hear the substantive application for an interdict against the respondents.as a pastor until his dismissal in 2018.
The dispute arises from a leadership wrangle that rocked the church between 2017 and 2019, which was eventually resolved by the Supreme Court. In judgment SC 67/21, the Supreme Court ruled that Amon Dubie Madawo was the legitimately elected leader of AFMZ.
Following that ruling, a faction led by Cossam Chiangwa broke away from AFMZ and formed a separate church using a similar nameCossam Chiangwa who leads the breakaway faction of the AFM church seen here in Liverpool during a church service (Picture via Facebook – AFMIM Vessels of Honour Liverpool page)
AFMZ told the court that it is a long-established Pentecostal church, founded in Zimbabwe around 1916, and operates as a legal entity with the capacity to own property and litigate in its own name.
Home Equity Loan vs. HELOC: Which Option Is Better?
Homeowners who have built equity may be able to borrow against their home through a home equity loan or a home equity line of credit, commonly called a HELOC. Both options use the home as collateral, but they work differently.
rnrn
A home equity loan provides a lump sum of money that is repaid over a set term with regular monthly payments. Many home equity loans have fixed interest rates, which makes payments predictable. This can be useful for one-time expenses such as a major home improvement project, debt consolidation, or a large planned purchase.
rnrn
A HELOC works more like a credit card. The lender gives you access to a line of credit, and you can borrow as needed during the draw period. HELOCs often have variable interest rates, meaning the payment can rise or fall over time. This flexibility can be useful for ongoing projects or uncertain expenses.
rnrn
The main advantage of a home equity loan is stability. You know how much you borrowed, what your payment is, and when the loan will be paid off. The main disadvantage is that you receive the full amount upfront, even if you do not need all of it immediately.
rnrn
The main advantage of a HELOC is flexibility. You can borrow only what you need, when you need it. The main risk is that variable rates can make payments unpredictable. Some borrowers may also be tempted to keep borrowing, which can increase debt.
rnrn
Before choosing either option, consider the risk. Because the loan is secured by your home, failure to repay could put your home at risk. Borrowing against home equity should be done carefully and for a clear financial purpose.
rnrn
Compare interest rates, fees, repayment terms, draw periods, closing costs, and whether the rate is fixed or variable. Also ask whether there are annual fees, early closure fees, or minimum withdrawal requirements.
rnrn
Home equity borrowing may make sense for improvements that increase property value or for consolidating high-interest debt with a clear repayment plan. It may not be wise for unnecessary spending or short-term lifestyle purchases.
rnrn
The best option depends on your goals. Choose a home equity loan if you need a fixed amount and predictable payment. Choose a HELOC if you need flexible access to funds over time.
rnrn
Before borrowing, compare lenders and review the full cost carefully.
rn
Cloud Computing Services Are Transforming Modern Businesses
Cloud computing has revolutionized the way businesses manage data, applications, and digital operations. Companies now rely on cloud platforms for secure storage, remote collaboration, software management, and disaster recovery planning. Cloud services allow businesses to scale operations efficiently without investing heavily in physical infrastructure and expensive server systems.
rnrn
There are several types of cloud computing services available, including Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS), Software as a Service (SaaS), and Platform as a Service (PaaS). Businesses use cloud systems for accounting software, customer relationship management, cybersecurity protection, and team collaboration tools. Remote work trends have further accelerated demand for secure cloud-based solutions worldwide.
rnrn
One of the biggest advantages of cloud computing is flexibility. Businesses can access applications and data securely from almost anywhere with an internet connection. Cloud providers also offer automated backups, software updates, and advanced security features designed to reduce operational risks and improve efficiency.
rnrn
Security remains a major consideration when selecting cloud providers. Companies must evaluate encryption standards, compliance certifications, and data protection policies carefully to ensure customer information remains secure. As digital transformation continues expanding globally, cloud computing is expected to remain a central part of business growth and innovation.
