Tuesday, August 25

800 Families Evicted From Msasa Park Following Court Rulings, 50 Already Evicted

Heartbreak In Harare As 800 Families Face Eviction From Msasa Park

A wave of evictions has descended upon the Harare suburb of Msasa Park, leaving 800 families facing the loss of their homes. This follows a series of court rulings that confirmed the land is privately owned by Msasa Park (Private) Limited. The legal process has concluded, and the evictions have now begun, with 50 families already removed from the property known as Stand 560 Chadcombe Township, which measures approximately 280 hectares.

 

 

 

 

The dispute started years ago when families began building homes on the land, believing it had been given to them. However, the landowners later proved in court that the property had always belonged to their private company.

In 2023, the company attempted to resolve the issue by initiating what it termed a “regularisation process.” This meant that residents could stay on the land if they bought their stands at a discounted price of US$15 (about R280) per square metre. However, some residents refused, arguing that the land had been donated to them and that they should not have to pay anything.

 

 

 

 

A group of approximately 800 people, led by Paina Machidza, took the matter to court to challenge the proposed payments and to prevent any evictions.

A Lengthy Legal Battle Ends

The group’s case was first heard by Justice Emilia Muchawa at the High Court. The judge ruled against them, stating that people cannot claim ownership of land simply because they reside on it or believe it was given to them.

After losing that case, the residents made several more legal attempts — they filed new cases in both the High Court and the Supreme Court — but all of these were dismissed.

According to The Herald, the landowners then returned to court and requested a summary judgment — a fast-tracked decision without a full trial — because they argued that the facts were already clear.

 

 

 

In July 2025, Justice Never Katiyo granted this summary judgment in favour of the company, effectively giving it the right to evict residents who had refused to buy their stands. The residents attempted to appeal again, but in October 2025, the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, ruling it defective — meaning it did not follow proper court procedures. That decision effectively ended the matter.

One of the landowners, Farai Zuva, explained that the purpose of the legal action was to make sure the area was developed in an organised way and that residents had proper legal ownership of their homes.

“Our objective is to ensure orderly development while allowing residents to benefit legally from their land,” Mr Zuva said.

Evictions Begin Amidst Tension

 

 

 

With all court cases settled, the evictions have now begun. The first 50 families have already been removed from their homes. Police were present to make sure the operation went smoothly and to prevent violence.

However, tensions ran high. In one reported incident, a resident named Onismus Mukau allegedly pulled out a gun and threatened police officers. He was quickly arrested by the Zimbabwe Republic Police (ZRP) Support Unit.

 

 

 

The evictions are expected to continue until all affected residents have either bought their land or vacated it. For the hundreds of other families still in Msasa Park, the situation remains tense and uncertain.

  • Share:

Info News

Commercial Truck Accident Lawsuit: What You Need to Know Before Filing

Filing a commercial truck accident lawsuit can be a critical step toward recovering damages after a serious crash. These lawsuits differ significantly from standard car accident claims because they often involve multiple defendants, including trucking companies, contractors, and manufacturers. Understanding the legal process is essential for building a strong case and avoiding costly mistakes.

rnrn

A truck collision attorney guides clients through every stage of litigation, from filing claims to negotiating settlements or going to trial. They ensure compliance with deadlines, gather key evidence, and develop a strategy tailored to the specifics of the case. With proper legal guidance, victims can improve their chances of obtaining fair compensation for injuries, property damage, and emotional distress.

rn

Navy Mesothelioma Lawyer: Asbestos Claims for Veterans

Navy mesothelioma lawyer, veterans mesothelioma lawyer, Navy asbestos exposure, asbestos claims for veterans, mesothelioma veterans benefits, shipyard asbestos lawyer

rnrn

Navy Mesothelioma Lawyer: Asbestos Claims for Veterans

rnrn

Many veterans, especially Navy veterans, were exposed to asbestos during military service. Ships, shipyards, engine rooms, boiler rooms, insulation, pipes, gaskets, valves, pumps, and other equipment commonly involved asbestos-containing materials.

rnrn

A Navy mesothelioma lawyer helps veterans and families investigate asbestos exposure and pursue compensation options.

rnrn

These claims may involve lawsuits against asbestos product manufacturers, asbestos trust funds, and possible veterans benefits.

rnrn

Why Navy Veterans Faced Asbestos Exposure

rnrn

Navy ships historically used asbestos because it resisted heat and fire.

rnrn

Asbestos may have been found in:

rnrn

Boiler insulation
rnPipe insulation
rnEngine rooms
rnTurbines
rnPumps
rnValves
rnGaskets
rnElectrical equipment
rnFireproofing materials
rnDeck materials
rnShipyard repair areas

rnrn

Veterans may have inhaled fibers during repair, maintenance, overhaul, or demolition work.

rnrn

Military Exposure and Civilian Companies

rnrn

Veterans usually do not sue the military for asbestos exposure. Instead, claims often focus on private companies that manufactured, supplied, or sold asbestos-containing products used by the military.

rnrn

A mesothelioma lawyer can help identify those companies.

rnrn

Veterans and Mesothelioma

rnrn

Mesothelioma can take decades to develop after asbestos exposure. A veteran exposed in the 1960s, 1970s, or 1980s may not be diagnosed until many years later.

rnrn

ATSDR notes that asbestos-related diseases usually appear many years after first exposure.

rnrn

What Compensation Options May Exist?

rnrn

Veterans may have several possible options:

rnrn

Asbestos lawsuit
rnAsbestos trust fund claims
rnVA disability benefits
rnDependency and indemnity compensation for survivors
rnMedical care benefits
rnWrongful death claims

rnrn

The right path depends on diagnosis, service history, exposure evidence, and family situation.

rnrn

What Evidence Helps a Navy Asbestos Claim?

rnrn

Useful evidence may include:

rnrn

DD-214
rnShip assignments
rnRate or job title
rnService records
rnShip repair records
rnShipyard employment records
rnCoworker statements
rnProduct identification
rnMedical diagnosis
rnPathology reports
rnVA records

rnrn

A lawyer experienced in Navy asbestos cases may already know which ships and equipment were associated with asbestos products.

rnrn

Common Navy Jobs With Exposure Risk

rnrn

Potentially exposed Navy roles may include:

rnrn

Machinist mates
rnBoiler technicians
rnPipefitters
rnElectricians
rnFiremen
rnEngine room workers
rnShipyard workers
rnHull technicians
rnMechanics
rnMaintenance crews
rnInsulators
rnSeabees

rnrn

Exposure may also have occurred during ship repair or overhaul.

rnrn

Can Family Members File Claims?

rnrn

If a veteran died from mesothelioma, surviving family members may be able to file wrongful death claims or trust fund claims, depending on state law and deadlines.

rnrn

Families should gather medical records, death certificate, service records, and work history.

rnrn

Final Thoughts

rnrn

Navy veterans with mesothelioma may have legal and benefit options connected to asbestos exposure.

rnrn

A Navy mesothelioma lawyer can help investigate shipboard exposure, identify asbestos products, file trust claims, and pursue compensation from responsible companies.

rnrn

Veterans served their country. They deserve clear answers when asbestos exposure leads to serious disease.

rn